At 7:20 PM +0200 3/30/03, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
At 12:59 AM + 3/23/03, "Jürgen" "Bömmels" (via RT) wrote:
>Yet another step in PIO:
>Enabling read buffering.
A test with this starts throwing errors at t/src/list and goes on from
there--lots of do
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 12:59 AM + 3/23/03, "Jürgen" "Bömmels" (via RT) wrote:
> >Yet another step in PIO:
> >Enabling read buffering.
>
> A test with this starts throwing errors at t/src/list and goes on from
> there--lots of double free errors. I can let the tests run
At 12:59 AM + 3/23/03, "Jürgen" "Bömmels" (via RT) wrote:
Yet another step in PIO:
Enabling read buffering.
A test with this starts throwing errors at t/src/list and goes on
from there--lots of double free errors. I can let the tests run to
completion if you need the list, but it looks like the
At 11:01 PM -0500 3/22/03, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
"JüRgen BöMmels" wrote:
[snip]
is(,
"JüRgen BöMmels" wrote:
[snip]
> is(, <, < char buf[1024];
[snip]
> len = PIO_read(interpreter, io, buf, sizeof(buf));
[snip]
> buf[len] = '\0';
This, almost certainly, should be:
buf[MIN(len, 1023)] = '\0';
After all, 'len' could concievably be 1024, if you decide to change you
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels
# Please include the string: [perl #21656]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21656 >
Hello,
Yet another step in PIO:
Enabling read buffering.
The first read will fill th