Re: [perl #21656] [PATCH] read buffering in i/o

2003-03-31 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 7:20 PM +0200 3/30/03, Juergen Boemmels wrote: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: At 12:59 AM + 3/23/03, "Jürgen" "Bömmels" (via RT) wrote: >Yet another step in PIO: >Enabling read buffering. A test with this starts throwing errors at t/src/list and goes on from there--lots of do

Re: [perl #21656] [PATCH] read buffering in i/o

2003-03-30 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 12:59 AM + 3/23/03, "Jürgen" "Bömmels" (via RT) wrote: > >Yet another step in PIO: > >Enabling read buffering. > > A test with this starts throwing errors at t/src/list and goes on from > there--lots of double free errors. I can let the tests run

Re: [perl #21656] [PATCH] read buffering in i/o

2003-03-23 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:59 AM + 3/23/03, "Jürgen" "Bömmels" (via RT) wrote: Yet another step in PIO: Enabling read buffering. A test with this starts throwing errors at t/src/list and goes on from there--lots of double free errors. I can let the tests run to completion if you need the list, but it looks like the

Re: [perl #21656] [PATCH] read buffering in i/o

2003-03-23 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:01 PM -0500 3/22/03, Benjamin Goldberg wrote: "JüRgen BöMmels" wrote: [snip] is(,

Re: [perl #21656] [PATCH] read buffering in i/o

2003-03-22 Thread Benjamin Goldberg
"JüRgen BöMmels" wrote: [snip] > is(, <, < char buf[1024]; [snip] > len = PIO_read(interpreter, io, buf, sizeof(buf)); [snip] > buf[len] = '\0'; This, almost certainly, should be: buf[MIN(len, 1023)] = '\0'; After all, 'len' could concievably be 1024, if you decide to change you

[perl #21656] [PATCH] read buffering in i/o

2003-03-22 Thread Jürgen
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels # Please include the string: [perl #21656] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21656 > Hello, Yet another step in PIO: Enabling read buffering. The first read will fill th