At 11:41 AM -0500 12/4/02, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
It's not our language to rename, though, so either the creator OKs it
or it goes. If there's an acceptable alternative spelling, we can use
that too.
The web site in the README in the parrot sources use
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> It's not our language to rename, though, so either the creator OKs it
> or it goes. If there's an acceptable alternative spelling, we can use
> that too.
The web site in the README in the parrot sources uses 'bf', as does at
least one of the sites refer
At 10:26 PM -0800 12/3/02, Brent Dax wrote:
Andy Dougherty:
# On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Leon Brocard wrote:
#
# > ps You might be concerned about the name. Well, CPAN has a module
# >which matches /fuck/ too. However, if everyone really thinks
# >it is a problem, I don't see a problem with s/fu
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
> Andy Dougherty:
> # Well, I'll speak up. I find the name needlessly crude and
> # offensive. I see no reason to use such a name and would
> # strongly prefer that Parrot didn't. Parrot is a collective
> # project representing a community of developers,
of that
nature?
Tanton
- Original Message -
From: "Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Andy Dougherty'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:26 AM
Subject: RE: [perl #18566] [PATCH]
> Andy Doughe
Andy Dougherty:
# On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Leon Brocard wrote:
#
# > ps You might be concerned about the name. Well, CPAN has a module
# >which matches /fuck/ too. However, if everyone really thinks
# >it is a problem, I don't see a problem with s/fuck/funk/g
#
# Well, I'll speak up. I fin
How about s/fuck/fork/?
--Josh
(mmm.. brainspork)
At 22:59 on 12/03/2002 EST, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 8:23 PM -0500 12/3/02, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Leon Brocard wrote:
> >
> >> ps You might be concerned about the name. Well, CPAN has a module
> >>
At 8:23 PM -0500 12/3/02, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Leon Brocard wrote:
ps You might be concerned about the name. Well, CPAN has a module
which matches /fuck/ too. However, if everyone really thinks
it is a problem, I don't see a problem with s/fuck/funk/g
Well, I'll
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Leon Brocard wrote:
> ps You might be concerned about the name. Well, CPAN has a module
>which matches /fuck/ too. However, if everyone really thinks
>it is a problem, I don't see a problem with s/fuck/funk/g
Well, I'll speak up. I find the name needlessly crude an
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:54:17PM +, Leon Brocard wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Leon Brocard
> # Please include the string: [perl #18566]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18566 >
>
>
> I've posted
# New Ticket Created by Leon Brocard
# Please include the string: [perl #18566]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18566 >
I've posted a Brainfuck interpreter on list in the past, but it kept
on getting made out
11 matches
Mail list logo
