Re: [perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2006-02-16 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Feb 16, 2006, at 19:24, Andy Dougherty wrote: sizeof(opcode_t) != sizeof(void*) is for sure broken. Well, it used to work, but that was a long time ago. Configure actually tests for this case and still claims it will work; perhaps that test should be changed to emit a much more dire mes

[perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2006-02-16 Thread Joshua Hoblitt via RT
This bug seems to have resolved itself at least on amd64/linux. Please re-open this bug if it's still failing for you. Thanks for reporting. -J --

Re: [perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2006-02-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2006, at 17:34, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > > >> This bug seems to have resolved itself at least on amd64/linux. > >> Please > >> re-open this bug if it's still failing for you. Thanks for reporting. > > A long long is 64 bit

Re: [perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2006-02-16 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Feb 16, 2006, at 17:34, Andy Dougherty wrote: This bug seems to have resolved itself at least on amd64/linux. Please re-open this bug if it's still failing for you. Thanks for reporting. A long long is 64 bit on amd64/linux this is the standard config and of course is working. This

Re: [perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2006-02-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: > This bug seems to have resolved itself at least on amd64/linux. Please > re-open this bug if it's still failing for you. Thanks for reporting. This configuration (intval=long long, opcode=long long, i386/linux) still fails. Last time I tried

Re: [perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2002-11-14 Thread Steve Fink
On Nov-08, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote: > > ># New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty > ># Please include the string: [perl #18189] > ># in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > ># http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18189 > > > >

Re: [perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2002-11-14 Thread Steve Fink
On Nov-01, Andy Dougherty wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty > # Please include the string: [perl #18189] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18189 > > > > Not OK: This is a failure report for pa

Re: [perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2002-11-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #18189] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18189 > Not OK: This is a failure report for parrot. When bu

[perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2002-11-01 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #18189] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18189 > Not OK: This is a failure report for parrot. When built with 'long long' INTVAL and o