Steve Fink writes:
>> >I don't know exactly who has the permissions to do these things, but
>> >I'm pretty sure that if you have commit access then you also have RT
>> >futzing access.
^^^ this isn't true. The permissions are seperate (but obviously
should be related.)
-R
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 02:51:24PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Steve Fink wrote:
>
>
> >I don't know exactly who has the permissions to do these things, but
> >I'm pretty sure that if you have commit access then you also have RT
> >futzing access.
>
> I tried to set the status of my patches
Steve Fink wrote:
I don't know exactly who has the permissions to do these things, but
I'm pretty sure that if you have commit access then you also have RT
futzing access.
I tried to set the status of my patches to resolved after committing and
got something like "forbidden".
Thanks!
le
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:19:45PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:09:54AM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> > Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op;
> > as an added bonus, it also tests two of the formats not previously
> > tested (%b and %o).
>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:09:54AM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op;
> as an added bonus, it also tests two of the formats not previously
> tested (%b and %o).
Thanks, applied
Nicholas Clark
--
Even better than the real thing:
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #17903]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17903 >
Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op;
as an added bonus,
