At 07:42 PM 10/8/2002 -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
>Thanks, applied.
>
>Who came up with the idea of two-argument ne, anyway? That's kind of
>bizarre. I'd much rather have it tested if it exists at all, but it
>seems pretty obscure.
It's not completely without precedent, on the Z-80:
RET CC
At 7:42 PM -0700 10/8/02, Steve Fink wrote:
>Thanks, applied.
>
>Who came up with the idea of two-argument ne, anyway? That's kind of
>bizarre.
Definitely bizarre. I think I'd rather not have it, it doesn't make much sense.
--
Dan
--
Thanks, applied.
Who came up with the idea of two-argument ne, anyway? That's kind of
bizarre. I'd much rather have it tested if it exists at all, but it
seems pretty obscure.
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #17803]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17803 >
The patches below add tests for:
print_i_i
print_i_n
print_i_s
print_i_p
n
