Sorry if this comment is out of context, I am behind but catching
up. The patch in [perl #16797] adds a scratchpad pmc (among other
things). Hopefully it is not too far out of date to apply. I
believe Melvin is looking into it ...
--
Jonathan Sillito
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Piers Cawley wrote:
> J
John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley wrote:
>>
>> >> Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> > But how do I represent them at parrot-level.
>>
>> Thanks for that John. I always relish being patronized.
>
> You're welcome, but that wasn't for you, that was for Juerge
Piers Cawley wrote:
>
> >> Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > But how do I represent them at parrot-level.
>
> Thanks for that John. I always relish being patronized.
You're welcome, but that wasn't for you, that was for Juergen
and anyone else who might have been wondering the
Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
>> >> Cool, applied. How far from "real" scheme are we?
>> >
>> > I think its quite far.
>> > The first thing is symbols and strings. But how do I represent them at
>> > parrot-level. PerlString
John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley wrote:
>> Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > But how do I represent them at parrot-level.
>>
>> { type => '*environment*' value => {scratchpad => aScratchPadPMC}
>
> Etc.
> The point being, we're building these things into par
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> >> Cool, applied. How far from "real" scheme are we?
> >
> > I think its quite far.
> > The first thing is symbols and strings. But how do I represent them at
> > parrot-level. PerlString maybe, but then how will they be distinct
> > from each ot
Piers Cawley wrote:
> Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But how do I represent them at parrot-level.
>
> { type => '*environment*' value => {scratchpad => aScratchPadPMC}
Etc.
The point being, we're building these things into parrot so that
HLLs can use them natively, rather than
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 1:58 PM + 9/5/02, "Jürgen" "Bömmels" (via RT) wrote:
> >The recent discussion of languages independence rememberd me of an
> >very old patch of mine which implements scheme pairs. (January 2002).
> >The languages/scheme directory did not change ve
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels
# Please include the string: [perl #17030]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17030 >
Hello,
The recent discussion of languages independence rememberd me of an
very old p
