Sunday 18 August 2002 00:38, Simon Cozens wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
> > Has someone looked at and maybe committed this?
>
> The reason I asked which pieces of Parrot were prototypes was
> because optimizing the hell out of something that's only a
> prototype is nothing shor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
> Has someone looked at and maybe committed this?
The reason I asked which pieces of Parrot were prototypes was because
optimizing the hell out of something that's only a prototype is nothing
short of intellectual masturbation, and it seems nobody actually
At 8:45 AM +0200 8/7/02, Angel Faus wrote:
>Dan Sugalski escribió:
>> At 8:40 AM +0200 8/6/02, Angel Faus wrote:
>> >The point about the lack of documentation remains, and i will
>> > solve it as soon as i get an indication that the design is ok.
>>
>> The design's fine, and we can add what we
At 9:47 PM + 7/29/02, Angel Faus (via RT) wrote:
>I've made a patch for the regex engine, designed with the single goal
>of seriously cheating for speed. :-)
Wow. Register spilling, and now this. Damn, with all the folks doing
clever things here, I'm feeling decidedly superfluous. :)
But...
# New Ticket Created by Angel Faus
# Please include the string: [perl #15797]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=15797 >
Hi,
I've made a patch for the regex engine, designed with the single goal
of seriously
