On Mon Jun 15 06:12:13 2015, mt1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 06/13/2015 04:06 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen (via RT) wrote:
>
> Hi,
> May I react on this? Would it be easier to have perl6 throw an error
> when there is a named parameter in the call while it isn't defined in
> the method. Something like
On 06/13/2015 04:06 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen (via RT) wrote:
Hi,
May I react on this? Would it be easier to have perl6 throw an error
when there is a named parameter in the call while it isn't defined in
the method. Something like 'Named parameter 'x' not defined by push' in
the example set bel
Liz is right. If a construct causes a significant number of people to
make a mistake, it's a design flaw that needs to be fixed.
On 6/13/15, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Elizabeth Mattijsen
> # Please include the string: [perl #125400]
> # in the subject line of all futu
# New Ticket Created by Elizabeth Mattijsen
# Please include the string: [perl #125400]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125400 >
I’m sending this in as a rakudo bug because I think it is.
We have confusion abou
