Well, it was clearly wrong to say that we don't care about it, sorry about
that. Maybe it's not the top priority thing (for example, there is a module to
do this: https://github.com/azawawi/perl6-memoize), but there are still plans
to get it done eventually.
I'll change the title a little bit so t
We no longer seem to care about “is cached”, so… I don't think we should reject
this (because it may be a nice test case once we start supporting cached
trait), but at the same time this ticket is kinda useless.
On 2014-06-01 03:12:32, elizabeth wrote:
> On 01 Jun 2014, at 12:07, Elizabeth Mattijs
# New Ticket Created by Elizabeth Mattijsen
# Please include the string: [perl #122004]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=122004 >
[07:39:51] m: sub a(int $i) is cached { return unless $i; a($i-1)
}; say a(
