Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Yeah, I had looked at that, but there are two things keeping me from
using Test::Distribution:
prereq
Checks whether all use()d modules that aren't in the perl core
are also mentioned in Makefile.PL's PREREQ_PM.
I have a few modules that are optional; not declared
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
I don't know if that answer your needs but Test::Distribution already
performs several kwalitee tests on the modules and other files of a
distribution.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Distribution/
Séba
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
I don't know if that answer your needs but Test::Distribution already
performs several kwalitee tests on the modules and other files of a
distribution.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Distribution/
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
--
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
I have an itch. It just came to me while surfing PerlMonks and CPAN.
I noticed the new Test::Strict module which keeps me honest by making
sure I always 'use strict'. I'll be adding that to my modules this
evening. [I wish is did use warnings too].
My second thought wa
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:05:36PM -0500, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> I have an itch. It just came to me while surfing PerlMonks and CPAN.
> I noticed the new Test::Strict module which keeps me honest by making
> sure I always 'use strict'. I'll be adding that to my modules this
> evening. [I wi
I have an itch. It just came to me while surfing PerlMonks and CPAN.
I noticed the new Test::Strict module which keeps me honest by making
sure I always 'use strict'. I'll be adding that to my modules this
evening. [I wish is did use warnings too].
My second thought was wouldn't it be cool if th
