At 05:44 PM 12/13/2001 +, Dave Mitchell wrote:
>I wrote:
>
> > (If you were to give me a PDD number, I might even get round to finishing
> > the doc off ;-)
>
>Okay, I lied
Oh, right, you already had it done and were using the thread of
unfinishedness to get a PDD number! Clever... ;-P
I wrote:
> (If you were to give me a PDD number, I might even get round to finishing
> the doc off ;-)
Okay, I lied
:-)
At 05:38 PM 12/13/2001 +, Dave Mitchell wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > D'oh! First I find the codings standard doc, then I get it an official PDD
> > number if it doesn't have one already. (Then I smack myself with it...)
>
>print "Dan, can I have a PDD number for my codin
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> D'oh! First I find the codings standard doc, then I get it an official PDD
> number if it doesn't have one already. (Then I smack myself with it...)
print "Dan, can I have a PDD number for my coding stds doc?\n" for 1..Inf;
(If you were to give me a PDD
At 11:15 AM 12/13/2001 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Thursday 13 December 2001 11:10 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At 11:33 PM 12/12/2001 -0500, Josh Wilmes wrote:
> > >Here are a few of the more clear-cut fixes I noticed from -Wall's
> > > whinings.
> >
> > Applied, with some hand-patching. (Y
At 11:22 AM 12/13/2001 -0500, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>Oops. Sorry, i'll attach it next time.
Inline's just fine. (Eudora has this nasty habit, when transferring mail
from IMAP-hosted mailboxes to local folders of *not* copying the
attachments, instead referencing the attachment in the IMAP box. Wh
Oops. Sorry, i'll attach it next time.
--Josh
At 11:10 on 12/13/2001 EST, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:33 PM 12/12/2001 -0500, Josh Wilmes wrote:
> >Here are a few of the more clear-cut fixes I noticed from -Wall's whinings.
>
> Applied, with some hand-patching. (Your maile
On Thursday 13 December 2001 11:10 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 11:33 PM 12/12/2001 -0500, Josh Wilmes wrote:
> >Here are a few of the more clear-cut fixes I noticed from -Wall's
> > whinings.
>
> Applied, with some hand-patching. (Your mailer threw in hard returns for
> lines over 80 characters)
At 11:33 PM 12/12/2001 -0500, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>Here are a few of the more clear-cut fixes I noticed from -Wall's whinings.
Applied, with some hand-patching. (Your mailer threw in hard returns for
lines over 80 characters)
Dan
-
Here are a few of the more clear-cut fixes I noticed from -Wall's whinings.
Index: key.c
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/key.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 key.c
- --- key.c 12 Dec 2001 02:52:52 - 1.2
+++
10 matches
Mail list logo
