Re: [Patch] - Changes iton and ntoi to set operators

2001-12-30 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 08:15 AM 12/30/2001 -1000, David & Lisa Jacobs wrote: >Here it is as an attachment. Is that the preferred Parrot Way (TM)? Depends on who you ask. :) I prefer inline if they don't get mangled. Other folks prefer attachments. The current pumpking is the ultimate arbiter here, so it'd be Simo

Re: [Patch] - Changes iton and ntoi to set operators

2001-12-30 Thread David & Lisa Jacobs
Here it is as an attachment. Is that the preferred Parrot Way (TM)? For now, I just moved the existing routines. I will see about inlining them and getting rid of local variables separately. David - Original Message - From: "Gregor N. Purdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mailer mangling preve

Re: [Patch] - Changes iton and ntoi to set operators

2001-12-30 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 07:44 AM 12/30/2001 -1000, David & Lisa Jacobs wrote: >This patch moves the conversion routines iton and ntoi into set. Got it, thanks. I'll go in as soon as the test build finishes. Dan --"it's like this"---

Re: [Patch] - Changes iton and ntoi to set operators

2001-12-30 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
David & Lisa -- Thanks! Mailer mangling prevents me from applying this. If you send again as an attachment, I can do it. I would like to see the implementations of the new set ops be marked 'inline', and I'd like to see them avoid using local variables, too. Regards, -- Gregor On Sun, 2001-

[Patch] - Changes iton and ntoi to set operators

2001-12-30 Thread David & Lisa Jacobs
This patch moves the conversion routines iton and ntoi into set. Index: core.ops === RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/core.ops,v retrieving revision 1.61 diff -c -r1.61 core.ops *** core.ops 30 Dec 2001 12:04:56 - 1.61 --- core.ops 3