At 12:58 16/08/2006 -0700, jerry gay wrote:
On 8/15/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's a proposed patch that seems to work okay for me on Linux. It's not
great or beautiful, mostly because of the Makefile hackery. It's a starting
point though. I suspect Windows might complain.
w
On Thursday 17 August 2006 00:28, Francois PERRAD wrote:
> I try it on Win2000 with MinGW.
> 1) ExtUtils::PkgConfig is a wrapper over pkg-config, and pkg-config is not
> available on Windows
Okay, that's a problem. It's actually a big problem, for two reasons.
First, linking against libparrot r
At 15:48 15/08/2006 -0700, chromatic wrote:
Here's a proposed patch that seems to work okay for me on Linux. It's not
great or beautiful, mostly because of the Makefile hackery. It's a starting
point though. I suspect Windows might complain.
I try it on Win2000 with MinGW.
1) ExtUtils::PkgCo
On 8/15/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's a proposed patch that seems to work okay for me on Linux. It's not
great or beautiful, mostly because of the Makefile hackery. It's a starting
point though. I suspect Windows might complain.
windows indeed complains. not only about miss
On 8/16/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 08:57, jerry gay wrote:
> i'll happily test, but i can't apply it, as it seems not to be in the
> format my patch util expects. did you use C? i don't see the
> familiar "Index: " headers.
It's a standard svk diff. Th
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 08:57, jerry gay wrote:
> i'll happily test, but i can't apply it, as it seems not to be in the
> format my patch util expects. did you use C? i don't see the
> familiar "Index: " headers.
It's a standard svk diff. That's really weird. Is this any better?
-- c
--- M
On 8/15/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's a proposed patch that seems to work okay for me on Linux. It's not
great or beautiful, mostly because of the Makefile hackery. It's a starting
point though. I suspect Windows might complain.
i'll happily test, but i can't apply it, as i
Here's a proposed patch that seems to work okay for me on Linux. It's not
great or beautiful, mostly because of the Makefile hackery. It's a starting
point though. I suspect Windows might complain.
I don't have any particular attachment to any approach here, only that this
get in the reposit
