Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> -- languages/perl6 should work equally well with 5.005_03 and 5.6.1.
s/should/does/
EOT ;-)
> /s
leo
At 8:23 AM -0700 7/31/02, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>> [Pardon the tardiness--digging through old mail]
>> At 3:39 PM -0400 7/22/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>> >At 12:00 PM 7/22/2002 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>> >>On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:21:09AM +0100,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> [Pardon the tardiness--digging through old mail]
> At 3:39 PM -0400 7/22/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
> >At 12:00 PM 7/22/2002 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:1
[Pardon the tardiness--digging through old mail]
At 3:39 PM -0400 7/22/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>At 12:00 PM 7/22/2002 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>>On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:15AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
>>> > "Sean O'Rourke"
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:15AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
> "Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > languages/perl6/README sort of hides it, but it does say that "If you have
> > Perl <= 5.005_03, "$a += 3" may fail to parse." I guess we can upgrade
> > that to "if you have < 5.6, you
At 12:00 PM 7/22/2002 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:15AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
> > > "Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > languages/perl6/README sort of hides it, but it does say t
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:15AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
> > "Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > languages/perl6/README sort of hides it, but it does say that "If you have
> > > Perl <= 5.005_03, "$a += 3" may fail
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> In October 2000 I believed that 5.005 maintenance *is* important for the
> acceptance of perl6, and I still do now:
Some minutes ago I sent a first patch to Sean, to make it work on 5.005_03.
One reason of failure is shown by the following snippet:
$ cat t1
#!/usr/bin/
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:15AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
> "Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > languages/perl6/README sort of hides it, but it does say that "If you have
> > Perl <= 5.005_03, "$a += 3" may fail to parse." I guess we can upgrade
> > that to "if you have < 5.6, you
"Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> languages/perl6/README sort of hides it, but it does say that "If you have
> Perl <= 5.005_03, "$a += 3" may fail to parse." I guess we can upgrade
> that to "if you have < 5.6, you lose".
I notice that DBI no longer supports Perl releases <5.6. See
Jeff wrote:
> Partial perl6 compiler
What should be the prerequisits for languages/perl6?
README and languages/perl6/README imply that it should work with perl
5.005, but it obviously doesn't.
(I tried to patch P6C and got it to compile, but the generated
Perl6grammar doesn't work).
With 5.6
Jeff wrote:
>
> As the message says. Code freeze tonight at midnight EDT (GMT-0400).
> I'll be tagging with PRE_REL_0.0.7 then.
Code slush at 2200, code freeze at 0030. Tag was actually named
PRE_REL_007.
> Features to be included:
>
> Perl 6 grammar
> Partial perl6 compiler
> Pure-perl assemb
As the message says. Code freeze tonight at midnight EDT (GMT-0400).
I'll be tagging with PRE_REL_0.0.7 then.
Features to be included:
Perl 6 grammar
Partial perl6 compiler
Pure-perl assembler
Heavily patched and upgraded intermediate language
Massive patching in general, cleaned-up PMCs.
FORTH
13 matches
Mail list logo
