Re: Re: [PATCH pmc2c.pl] Tracking line numbers

2002-01-02 Thread Steve Fink
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 11:49:40PM +, Alex Gough wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Steve Fink wrote: > > > This patch makes pmc2c.pl emit #line directives to .c files so the > > Good plan, saves me hitting M-x revert-buffer every time I try to > change something when hunting. Is this likely to m

Re: [PATCH pmc2c.pl] Tracking line numbers

2002-01-02 Thread Alex Gough
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Steve Fink wrote: > This patch makes pmc2c.pl emit #line directives to .c files so the Good plan, saves me hitting M-x revert-buffer every time I try to change something when hunting. Is this likely to make it harder to charge through the actual C with a debugger, if so, can

Re: [PATCH pmc2c.pl] Tracking line numbers

2002-01-02 Thread Steve Fink
Oops, left out a chunk. I get confused when I have too many interfering local changes. Here's a snippet for classes/Makefile.in that needs to be applied along with the previous pmc2c.pl patch for #lines. Index: classes/Makefile.in ==

[PATCH pmc2c.pl] Tracking line numbers

2002-01-02 Thread Steve Fink
This patch makes pmc2c.pl emit #line directives to .c files so the debugger can trace the code back to the editable source. However, I also have a larger patch that supersedes this one, but it changes behavior. I just wanted to get this out first in case the later one is deemed a bad idea. The la