Adam Thomason sent the following bits through the ether:
> No troubles here (see the palaeodictyoptera tinderbox). Is procps
> up-to-date? Is NPTL causing different PIDs to show up?
OK, chalk it up to dodgy Fedora in that case. Please do not apply
patch.
Leon
--
Leon Brocard..
> -Original Message-
> From: Leon Brocard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 3:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PATCH] signals under x86_64
>
>
> Signals no worky under x86_64. I don't really understand why. Seeing
> as we&
Leopold Toetsch sent the following bits through the ether:
> Is this available on e.g. Windows?
Possibly, it's just POSIX. I have no way to test this however.
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
scribot.http://www.scribot.com/
Leon Brocard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +use POSIX ('uname');
Is this available on e.g. Windows?
leo
Signals no worky under x86_64. I don't really understand why. Seeing
as we're skipping on lots of platforms anyway, I've added it to the
list of skipped platforms.
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
scribot.http://www.scribot.co
