Unfortunately I haven't been able to test the patch, however, icc
*should* handle -W flags exactly the same as gcc. And if it doesn't,
then there is an issue there we (or Intel) should deal with. So, I
would update the patch to ask if we have gcc or icc. I agree that -W
doesn't apply to some ot
On 09/01/2008, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 20:09:26 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
> > --- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist 2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
> > +++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
> > @@ -132,17 +132,22 @@
> >
On Monday 07 January 2008 20:09:26 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> --- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist 2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
> +++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
> @@ -132,17 +132,22 @@
> $verbose = $conf->options->get('verbose');
> print "\n" if
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
--- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
+++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
@@ -132,17 +132,22 @@
Thanks, Jarkko. Since I'm working on correcting other problems with
auto::warnings and its tests in an
--- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
+++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
@@ -132,17 +132,22 @@
$verbose = $conf->options->get('verbose');
print "\n" if $verbose;
-# add on some extra warnings if requested
-pu
