Re: [PATCH] pop_pad and a few small fixes

2003-06-01 Thread Luke Palmer
> Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +op pop_pad(out PMC) { > > +$1 = new_pmc_header(interpreter); > > +stack_pop(interpreter, &interpreter->ctx.pad_stack, > > + &$1, STACK_ENTRY_PMC); > > goto NEXT(); > > Do we really need a new PMC header here? The PMC already m

Re: [PATCH] pop_pad and a few small fixes

2003-06-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +op pop_pad(out PMC) { > +$1 = new_pmc_header(interpreter); > +stack_pop(interpreter, &interpreter->ctx.pad_stack, > + &$1, STACK_ENTRY_PMC); > goto NEXT(); Do we really need a new PMC header here? The PMC already must have one. >

[PATCH] pop_pad and a few small fixes

2003-06-01 Thread Luke Palmer
This patch is a collection of a few small fixes vaguely related to the lexical pads. It implements pop_pad(out PMC), banishes Intval in favor of INTVAL, and adds some newlines to internal_exception calls. Luke Index: core.ops === RC