Re: [PATCH] parrot-build-1: Build parrot incl. imcc files take 1

2003-10-02 Thread Robert Spier
> Then we've got patches to submit to IBM when we have 'em ready. We can't > require GNU make -- it isn't available on some platforms, and I honestly > don't see what reason there would be to require it over other make > variants. I think this is energy spent in the wrong place. But we've discuss

Re: [perl #24080] [PATCH] parrot-build-1: Build parrot incl. imcc files take 1

2003-10-02 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Robert Spier wrote: > > I don't know what "info make" "Syntax of Static Pattern Rules" is (since I > > don't have info installed on my Solaris system) but I'm guessing that > > whatever it is, it's the underlying cause for Solaris make to complain: > > info is the texinfo doc r

Re: [perl #24080] [PATCH] parrot-build-1: Build parrot incl. imcc files take 1

2003-10-02 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Michael Scott wrote: > > On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 04:48 Europe/Berlin, Robert Spier wrote: > > [snip] > > > (We probably could simplify things by requiring GNU make.. but I'm not > > going to start that now.) > > Now that you mention it ... ICU requires GNU make. Then we'v

Re: [perl #24080] [PATCH] parrot-build-1: Build parrot incl. imcc files take 1

2003-10-02 Thread Michael Scott
On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 04:48 Europe/Berlin, Robert Spier wrote: [snip] (We probably could simplify things by requiring GNU make.. but I'm not going to start that now.) Now that you mention it ... ICU requires GNU make. Mike

Re: [perl #24080] [PATCH] parrot-build-1: Build parrot incl. imcc files take 1

2003-10-01 Thread Robert Spier
> I don't know what "info make" "Syntax of Static Pattern Rules" is (since I > don't have info installed on my Solaris system) but I'm guessing that > whatever it is, it's the underlying cause for Solaris make to complain: info is the texinfo doc reader, generally used for GNU documentation.. thu

Re: [perl #24080] [PATCH] parrot-build-1: Build parrot incl. imcc files take 1

2003-10-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know what "info make" "Syntax of Static Pattern Rules" is It was a rule like: $(dir/o_files) : %.o : %.c dependencies Its now separated into two. Thanks for the feedback, I've sent an updated version to bugs-parrot. leo

Re: [perl #24080] [PATCH] parrot-build-1: Build parrot incl. imcc files take 1

2003-10-01 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > The only problematic thing AFAIK might be the automatic rule in > root.in:594 that includes the private imcc headers for building > IMCC_O_FILES. I don't know if other makes are capable of "info make" > "Syntax of Static Pattern Rules". If not, we proba

[perl #24080] [PATCH] parrot-build-1: Build parrot incl. imcc files take 1

2003-10-01 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch # Please include the string: [perl #24080] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24080 > Attached is a first attempt to prepare for the move of languages/imcc to imcc and to