Re: [PATCH] new header buflen

2002-05-20 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Jason Gloudon wrote: > > The buflen of a new header was not always set to 0, which would cause SIGSEGVs > when parrot_reallocate tries to copy a non-zero length buffer with a bufstart > of NULL. This would happen when buffers get recycled. > > I don't know if new_pmc_header

[PATCH] new header buflen

2002-05-20 Thread Jason Gloudon
The buflen of a new header was not always set to 0, which would cause SIGSEGVs when parrot_reallocate tries to copy a non-zero length buffer with a bufstart of NULL. This would happen when buffers get recycled. I don't know if new_pmc_header has the same problem, but it also does not initialize