Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +PObj_COW_CLEAR((PObj*)buf);
Applied, thanks.
leo
Dan Sugalski writes:
> At 10:09 PM +0100 1/12/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This fixes a rather obvious and silly oversight in my patch.
> >
> >> +PObj_COW_CLEAR((PObj*)buf);
> >
> >I don't think that works or better let's say: it's ok 50 percent - fo
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:09 PM +0100 1/12/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I think I'd as soon leave COW-marked buffers as COW forever, or until
> they're garbage collected.
I'm thinking of that:
1) "main" creates and calls "sub1" which returns
- sub1 doesn't mess with the B
At 10:09 PM +0100 1/12/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This fixes a rather obvious and silly oversight in my patch.
+PObj_COW_CLEAR((PObj*)buf);
I don't think that works or better let's say: it's ok 50 percent - for
the new "buf" chunk, but the old one, whic
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This fixes a rather obvious and silly oversight in my patch.
> +PObj_COW_CLEAR((PObj*)buf);
I don't think that works or better let's say: it's ok 50 percent - for
the new "buf" chunk, but the old one, which maybe hasn't any refering
COWed copy anymore
This fixes a rather obvious and silly oversight in my patch.
Luke
Index: src/register.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/src/register.c,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.35 register.c
--- src/register.c 12 Jan 2004 09:50:2
