Re: [PATCH] Minor printf fix

2003-02-01 Thread Nick Glencross
Nicholas Clark wrote: I've just found this in my mailbox. Presumably that means that nobody applied it. However, I can't find the bit of packfile that used to have this, so I presume that the unimplemented wordsize transforms were implemented at some point in the past 9 months. :-) Thanks for th

Re: [PATCH] Minor printf fix

2003-02-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nicholas Clark wrote: *** packfile.c 20 May 2002 01:28:32 - 1.48 if(self->need_wordsize) { return 0; I presume that the unimplemented wordsize transforms were implemented at some point in the past 9 months. :-) Yep, mostly in my last two packfile patches this week.

Re: [PATCH] Minor printf fix

2003-02-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 04:35:18PM +0100, Nick Glencross wrote: > here's a small fix to a printf which I sometimes trigger. Looks like a > ')' and '\n' went missing. Feel free to adjust it to meets coding standards. > Index: packfile.c > ==

[PATCH] Minor printf fix

2002-05-25 Thread Nick Glencross
Hi, here's a small fix to a printf which I sometimes trigger. Looks like a ')' and '\n' went missing. Feel free to adjust it to meets coding standards. Nick Index: packfile.c === RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/packfile.c,v retrievi