Re: [PATCH] Minor nit in overview.pod [APPLIED]
At 7:46 PM + 1/28/02, Simon Glover wrote: > > There is no opcodes.pod; I'm assuming the pointer should actually be to > parrot_assembly.pod, as the canonical documentation. Applied, thanks. -- Dan --"it's like th
[PATCH] Minor nit in overview.pod
There is no opcodes.pod; I'm assuming the pointer should actually be to parrot_assembly.pod, as the canonical documentation. Simon --- overview.pod.oldMon Jan 28 19:42:55 2002 +++ overview.podMon Jan 28 19:43:06 2002 @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ These areas will roughly map to compilation