Re: [PATCH] #38627: [TODO] fill Parrot_register_move() with code

2006-07-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:27:30PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:39:19PM -0500, Vishal Soni wrote: > > src_regs and dest_regs are pointers to unsigned char. Unsinged char > > being 1 byte will store 256 distinct values. Hence I declared the > > MAX_REGISTER to 256. >

[perl #39693] Re: [PATCH] #38627: [TODO] fill Parrot_register_move() with code

2006-07-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Chip Salzenberg # Please include the string: [perl #39693] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39693 > Thanks muchly for this contribution. I love making failing tests pass. There are so

[perl #39695] Re: [PATCH] #38627: [TODO] fill Parrot_register_move() with code

2006-07-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Chip Salzenberg # Please include the string: [perl #39695] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39695 > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:39:19PM -0500, Vishal Soni wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-03 at

Re: [PATCH] #38627: [TODO] fill Parrot_register_move() with code

2006-07-03 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:39:19PM -0500, Vishal Soni wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 13:03 -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > > The use of a fixed constant like MAX_REGISTER doesn't really work; Parrot > > has an unbounded (if not infinite :-)) number of registers [...] > > You'll have to use the INTV

Re: [PATCH] #38627: [TODO] fill Parrot_register_move() with code

2006-07-03 Thread Vishal Soni
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 13:03 -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > Thanks muchly for this contribution. I love making failing tests pass. > There are some adjustments needed, though, before we can integrate this > patch into Parrot. > > The use of a fixed constant like MAX_REGISTER doesn't really work;

[perl #39694] Re: [PATCH] #38627: [TODO] fill Parrot_register_move() with code

2006-07-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Vishal Soni # Please include the string: [perl #39694] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39694 > On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 13:03 -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > Thanks muchly for this contr

Re: [PATCH] #38627: [TODO] fill Parrot_register_move() with code

2006-07-03 Thread Chip Salzenberg
Thanks muchly for this contribution. I love making failing tests pass. There are some adjustments needed, though, before we can integrate this patch into Parrot. The use of a fixed constant like MAX_REGISTER doesn't really work; Parrot has an unbounded (if not infinite :-)) number of registers, s

[perl #39683] [PATCH] #38627: [TODO] fill Parrot_register_move() with code

2006-07-02 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Vishal Soni # Please include the string: [perl #39683] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39683 > This transaction appears to have no contentThis patch implements the register content pr

[PATCH] #38627: [TODO] fill Parrot_register_move() with code

2006-07-02 Thread Vishal Soni
This patch implements the register content preserving move operation.  Thanks,VishalPreviously:-Now:1..3ok 1 - in P paramok 2 - tailcall 1not ok 3 - tailcall 2 # TODO use temp# Failed (TODO) test (t/compilers/imcc/imcpasm/optc.t at line 59) #   '# IMCC does produce b