Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> Applied. (Was there anything besides the /tmp change? That's all that
> was in the attachment)
Calling 'rel2abs' was necessary so Parrot::Test would have the right
path to the test file later when it cd's to the main parrot directory
and calls './parrot'. That's all it ne
At 7:02 PM -0500 4/21/04, Allison Randal wrote:
Dan wrote:
Well... the big problems we were make-related, with some tinder
issues. Basically if any test suite died really hard the testing
would stop, and only the last test suite run counted for tinder
good/bad reporting.
At this point, though,
Dan wrote:
>
> Well... the big problems we were make-related, with some tinder
> issues. Basically if any test suite died really hard the testing
> would stop, and only the last test suite run counted for tinder
> good/bad reporting.
>
> At this point, though, I'm comfortable making it so that
At 5:55 PM -0500 4/21/04, Allison Randal wrote:
So, very quickly:
1. The main goal is to have unified languages tests, that is, make
language-tests would get a list of all the test files for all of the
languages, and then run only _one_ harness with all those files. This
would allow for one ni
Jerome wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I've been very busy for 2 weeks, and did not have the time to
> continue things regarding this topic. :-(
> I hope to have some more time this week-end, but I'm not even sure...
It happens. :)
> So, very quickly:
> 1. The main goal is to have unified languages tests
At 12:23 AM +0200 4/22/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
7. The patch has some, erm, "action at distance" problems, such as the
pasm files put in /tmp
Is that a side effect or needed?
It's just a side-effect, and we can put the old behavior back, I expect.
--
Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 7. The patch has some, erm, "action at distance" problems, such as the
> pasm files put in /tmp
Is that a side effect or needed?
leo
Allison Randal wrote:
> Okay, languages/perl6 is failing all its tests.
[...]
> Will or Jerome, could you take a minute to explain the direction
> you're taking Parrot::Test? I'll patch P6C::TestCompiler to match the
> new setup, but I want to do an "architecture sanity check" first.
I'm sorry, I'
Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will or Jerome, could you take a minute to explain the direction you're
> taking Parrot::Test? I'll patch P6C::TestCompiler to match the new
> setup, but I want to do an "architecture sanity check" first.
I'd rather have the test files back in our tree.
Okay, languages/perl6 is failing all its tests.
The problem is in a few recent changes to lib/Parrot/Test.pm. The Perl
6 test module in languages/perl6/P6C/TestCompiler.pm inherits from
Parrot::Test, but overrides some subs. P6C::TestCompiler's
&generate_pbc_for is writing the .pasm files in subdi
10 matches
Mail list logo
