:
R S22-package-format-OLD.pod
Log Message:
---
Remove obsolete file
S21-calling-foreign-code.pod
Log Message:
---
S21: removing now obsolete mentions of zavolaj
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #83250]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=83250 >
rakudo: say Int !%% 2;
rakudo d3e9a3: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Infix !% is deprecated in
fa
Message:
---
[S19] (Hopefully) clarified purpose of obsolete -P and -u options
Reini Urban (via RT) wrote:
Old: Guess extensions, so that the user can drop the extensions
leaving it up to the build process/install whether or not
a .pbc, .pasm, .past or a .pir file is used.
New: Search only for .pbc, .pasm, and .pir in that order.
The .past file-extension is *long* depreca
the Makefile does.
I suspect it's obsolete and can just be removed.
Thanks,
Pm
# New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
# Please include the string: [perl #57324]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57324 >
Hi,
It seems that this file may be no longer used (no change since r25301 -
2008-01-27
Bernhard++
-J
--
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 09:55:47PM +0100, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> It looks like the script 'tools/dev/genrpt.pl' does basically the same as
> 'parrotbug'.
> In order to decrease the level of confusion I propose to remove
> genrpt.pl and the associated make targets 'ok', 'o
It looks like the script 'tools/dev/genrpt.pl' does basically the same as
'parrotbug'.
In order to decrease the level of confusion I propose to remove
genrpt.pl and the associated make targets 'ok', 'okfile', 'nok', 'nokfile'.
CU, Bernhard
"Michael Walter (via RT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Removed exports for functions which apparently got removed recently.
Thanks, applied (r9461).
Jonathan
# New Ticket Created by Michael Walter
# Please include the string: [perl #37414]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37414 >
Removed exports for functions which apparently got removed recently.
parrotdef.pl.p
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since no one has said anything to the contrary, would someone remove
> it?
Done.
leo
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:48:22 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any reason to keep lib/Make.pm around?
>
> No, AFAIK.
Since no one has said anything to the contrary, would someone remove
it? Then I'll close the appropriate ti
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any reason to keep lib/Make.pm around?
No, AFAIK.
leo
Is there any reason to keep lib/Make.pm around? It was used by
make.pl, but that was deleted more than a year ago. Grepping the
parrot directory returns no occurrences of 'use Make;'.
If it is deleted, #15988 (Make.pl might load the wrong Make.pm) can be closed.
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.die
On Oct-05, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> This patch removes two files that are no longer generated from
> MANIFEST.generated.
Thanks, applied.
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #31850]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31850 >
This patch removes two files that are no longer generated from
MANIFEST.generated.
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Here is a list of files that I consider to be unused:
Hmmm... obsolete... unused... sounds a lot like languages/perl6 :-P
- Joe
lib/Parrot/Optimizer.pm
They haven't been touched for 20 months / 16 months respectively, I
don't know of anybody using them, and I think that IMCC makes them
obsolete.
Yep, that's right.
BTW, what about the perl PackFile stuff, unused and outdated too?
Simon
Thanks,
leo
hem, and I think that IMCC makes them
obsolete.
Yep, that's right.
BTW, what about the perl PackFile stuff, unused and outdated too?
Simon
Thanks,
leo
months / 16 months respectively, I
don't know of anybody using them, and I think that IMCC makes them
obsolete.
Simon
Here is a list of files that I consider to be unused:
* ops2cgc.pl
unused, functionality is in ops2c.pl
* make.pl
unused?, seems outdated
* classes/csub.pmc
AFAIK unused, we have NCI, method_util is outdated
* classes/pointer.pmc
used AFAIK only by rx.ops - should be a ManagedStruct
If no o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo / Dan --
Have we allocated PASM or IMC directives to replace the setline, setfile,
and setpackage ops?
* .file
* .line []
* .package
Should we have an indicator of the name of a sub, too?
We don't need .file/.line, imcc knows these, and passes the inf
:35 AM
To: P6I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Status of PXS and some IMHO obsolete ops
As stated in the thread "pxs help", the QT example can be expressed in
terms of NCI. So IMHO the following opsen are
As stated in the thread "pxs help", the QT example can be expressed in
terms of NCI. So IMHO the following opsen are obsolete:
- loadext (unused)
- callnative (only in QtHelloWorld.pasm, unimplemented)
And further:
- setline
- setfile
- setpackage
which are already/ought to be
The two patches in this thread are obsoleted by the 'core key support'
patch I just posted.
26 matches
Mail list logo
