Re: [NEW] library/sdl.imc

2004-02-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 23:39 schrieb Leopold Toetsch: >> >> I'll have a look at that _init call tomorrow - albeit _init (it was that >> name IIRC) could be a too commonly used label. _library_init or such >> could be better. > That sounds reas

Re: [NEW] library/sdl.imc

2004-02-19 Thread Jens Rieks
Hi, Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 23:39 schrieb Leopold Toetsch: > Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Me too. There's supposed to be a magic initialization sub of some kind > > called on library load. I'm inclined to stick it in there, but it's not > > there yet. > > I'll have a look at

Re: [NEW] library/sdl.imc

2004-02-19 Thread Jens Rieks
Hi, Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 05:54 schrieb chromatic: > On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote: > > here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library. > > It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most > > important SDL functions directly available i

Re: [NEW] library/sdl.imc

2004-02-19 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Me too. There's supposed to be a magic initialization sub of some kind > called on library load. I'm inclined to stick it in there, but it's not > there yet. I'll have a look at that _init call tomorrow - albeit _init (it was that name IIRC) could be a too

Re: [NEW] library/sdl.imc

2004-02-19 Thread chromatic
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 10:20, Jerome Quelin wrote: > I really dislike having to .include sdl.imc in a sub to .include the > other outside... Me too. There's supposed to be a magic initialization sub of some kind called on library load. I'm inclined to stick it in there, but it's not there yet.

Re: [NEW] library/sdl.imc

2004-02-19 Thread Jerome Quelin
chromatic wrote: > On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote: > > here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library. > > It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most > > important SDL functions directly available in PIR code. > Overall this looks good. [sni

Re: [NEW] library/sdl.imc

2004-02-18 Thread chromatic
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote: > here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library. > It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most important > SDL functions directly available in PIR code. Overall this looks good. I am not sure if it is better

[NEW] library/sdl.imc

2004-02-13 Thread Jens Rieks
Hi, here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library. It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most important SDL functions directly available in PIR code. jens =head1 TITLE library/sdl.imc - PIR interface to SDL =head1 SYNOPSIS .include "library/sdl