Klaas-Jan Stol schrieb:
I wonder in what case it's useful to have a "normal" .local directive in a
macro (with its normal semantics).
Every time the macro is expanded, the same local var. would be declared,
which can't be good.
As far as I understand it, PIR macros a simple text replacements w
On 10/2/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>> The big overall cunning plan is to remove ".local" for this purpose
> >>> (defining labels), and to use ".local" ONLY for declaring variables.
> >>> Then, once all ".local" (in macros) are replaced by ".lab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The big overall cunning plan is to remove ".local" for this purpose
(defining labels), and to use ".local" ONLY for declaring variables.
Then, once all ".local" (in macros) are replaced by ".label", we can
start replacing ".sym"s by ".local", so that ".sym" can be remov
On Sep 28, 12:45 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernhard
Schmalhofer) wrote:
> Klaas-Jan Stol schrieb:> hi,
>
> > attached a patch that adds ".label" as a directive to declare labels
> > in a macro.
> Applied in r21624.
thanks!
>
> > The big overall cunning plan is to remove ".local" for this purpose
> >
Klaas-Jan Stol schrieb:
hi,
attached a patch that adds ".label" as a directive to declare labels
in a macro.
Applied in r21624.
The big overall cunning plan is to remove ".local" for this purpose
(defining labels), and to use ".local" ONLY for declaring variables.
Then, once all ".local"
hi,
attached a patch that adds ".label" as a directive to declare labels in a
macro.
The big overall cunning plan is to remove ".local" for this purpose
(defining labels), and to use ".local" ONLY for declaring variables.
Then, once all ".local" (in macros) are replaced by ".label", we can start