RE: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-29 Thread Garrett Goebel
Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > Anyway: > - are there platforms with quad precision floats out there? Several documents refer to quad precision hardware, but I can't find direct references to any. > - or should 12 byte long doubles get converted to 8 byte IEEE doubles. Perhaps the following quote f

RE: [CVS ci] packfile #2 [x-bayes]

2003-01-29 Thread Garrett Goebel
From: Bryan C. Warnock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 17:12, Garrett Goebel wrote: > > > > There are 3 standard binary IEEE 754 derived formats: > > > > Single Precision: 4 bytes > > Double Precision: 8 bytes > > Quadruple Precision: 16 bytes > > Actually, Quads

Re: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-29 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 04:56, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:53:25AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > Garrett Goebel wrote: > > > Many thanks for the links (searching for this stuff is a pain, there are > > too many results ;-) > > > > Anyway: > > - are there platforms with q

RE: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-29 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 17:12, Garrett Goebel wrote: > Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > > > - 8/12 byte float issues are still the same - are these > >formats really portable, or should we try to store > >ASCII equivalents? > > No? > > ? Because my knowledge here approaches zero, so I'm just ap

Re: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-29 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:53:25AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Garrett Goebel wrote: > Many thanks for the links (searching for this stuff is a pain, there are > too many results ;-) > > Anyway: > - are there platforms with quad precision floats out there? sparc Solaris and Irix both have 1

Re: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-28 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Garrett Goebel wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > - 8/12 byte float issues are still the same - are these >formats really portable, or should we try to store >ASCII equivalents? No? ? Because my knowledge here approaches zero, so I'm just aping information back at you from google se

RE: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-28 Thread Garrett Goebel
Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > - 8/12 byte float issues are still the same - are these >formats really portable, or should we try to store >ASCII equivalents? No? ? Because my knowledge here approaches zero, so I'm just aping information back at you from google searches and scanning documen

[CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-27 Thread Leopold Toetsch
So more changes in packfile and related files, including: - all packfile segments share a common header which is effectively the format of a byte_code segment - all packfile segments conforming to this format are unpacked with the default_unpack routine, which just sets up a pointer to the d