On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Brent Dax wrote:
> # One point - should we update the docs Makefile to spit out
> documentation
> # for all of the ops files? At the moment we're only doing this for
> io.ops
> # and core.ops (which just got a lot smaller).
>
> This is probably a good idea.
>
OK, I've ju
Simon Glover:
# A fresh checkout builds and tests fine here (Linux/x86).
I forgot to mention that it tests as well as can be expected on Windows
and Darwin.
# One point - should we update the docs Makefile to spit out
documentation
# for all of the ops files? At the moment we're only doing thi
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Brent Dax wrote:
> The core.ops split has been committed. Documentation has been fixed up,
> and all the copyright stuff should be correct.
>
> Please remember to reassemble any Parrot bytecode files you currently
> have.
A fresh checkout builds and tests fine here (Linux/
The core.ops split has been committed. Documentation has been fixed up,
and all the copyright stuff should be correct.
Please remember to reassemble any Parrot bytecode files you currently
have.
--Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perl and Parrot hacker
"Yeah, and my underwear is flame-retardant--
