Brent Dax wrote:
>
> Jeff:
> # I haven't been tracking assembly speed at all. Keep in mind
> # that a perl assembler is only a temporary measure, and it'll
> # be rewritten in C eventually. It's only written in Perl so
>
> C or PASM (or Perl 6)? The latter might be better.
PASM is tempting, if
Jeff:
# I haven't been tracking assembly speed at all. Keep in mind
# that a perl assembler is only a temporary measure, and it'll
# be rewritten in C eventually. It's only written in Perl so
C or PASM (or Perl 6)? The latter might be better.
--Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@roles=map {"Parr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 May 2002 01:19:25 -0400 Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >newasm now handles constants, macros, and local >labels within. Here's a
>
> Great work!
Thanks.
> >expansion. Also, they don't expand >recursively. '.constant FOO
> >"blah"n.constant BAR "Hey
On Tue, 28 May 2002 01:19:25 -0400 Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>newasm now handles constants, macros, and local >labels within. Here's a
Great work!
>expansion. Also, they don't expand >recursively. '.constant FOO
>"blah"n.constant BAR "Hey, .FOO"' won't do what >you want, sadly.
Thats ex
newasm now handles constants, macros, and local labels within. Here's a
short test program that exercises all three featurs. Doesn't do much,
but here it is:
print "Everything else is as usual.\n"
..macro MyMacro ( FOO, Bar ) # Macros are now prepended with '.'.
print .FOO # . also prepends ou
