在 2006/7/5 上午 12:15 時，chromatic 寫到：
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 21:01, Audrey Tang wrote:
Hence I'm puzzled why you raise the "dynamic language" categorization
as a justification, for that term usually refers to dynamic typing,
not to :immediate. If it is referring to :immediate, then Python/
Ru
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 21:01, Audrey Tang wrote:
> Hence I'm puzzled why you raise the "dynamic language" categorization
> as a justification, for that term usually refers to dynamic typing,
> not to :immediate. If it is referring to :immediate, then Python/
> Ruby/PHP would become static langua
