i'm afraid you didn't read the docs very closely...
Returns the contents of a directory as a lazy list of IO::Path objects
stringifying an IO::Path object gives you a large string.
the examples in the docs take up more room than the description of the
routine. here's the first:
Examples:
> # T
you want a negative lookahead assertion, which are described (with an
example) at https://docs.perl6.org/language/regexes#Lookahead_Assertions
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:10 AM, Todd Chester wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What I am trying to do is to replace a quote `"`
> with `inches`, but NOT when the quot
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> Cannot assign to a non-container
> in sub infix:<=> at src/gen/CORE.setting:11692
> in block at /tmp/ZZZ:4
>
you're attempting to modify a string constant, which cannot be
modified. try something like (untested):
my $snippet
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 15:56, Damian Conway wrote:
> Carl proposed:
>
>> The other path that seems reasonable to me would be to use the same
>> naming scheme as for the block types, i.e. reserve all-upper and
>> all-lower forms (and die if an unrecognized one of this form is
>> encountered), and l
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 07:45, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> No, 42/13 is 42 over 13, which is 3 + 3/13. Let's not confuse
> fractions and bases, please.
>
ha! yet another case of crossed wires too early in the morning. sorry
for the confusion, i've been making similar apologies all day. too
bad i don'
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:17, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was fiddling about with a small example of how nice radix adverbials are
> for conversion:
>
> my $x = 6*9;
> say :13($x);
>
> rakudo: 69
>
> ($x = 54 in base 10, but 54 in base 13 is 69 in base 10.)
>
> Strangely enough, I cannot f
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 00:53, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> The spec doesn't elaborate on how the short args are specified in the
> signature of MAIN. I see two possible approaches (that don't contradict):
>
> 1) one renames them in the signature, so it would like
>
> sub MAIN(:name(:$n))
>
> then $n has
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:17, Thom Boyer wrote:
> I'm curious about the change from "blorst" to "blast." I quickly figured out
> that "blorst" was
> derived from "BLock OR STatement" (as S04 used to say: "In fact,
> most of these phasers will take either a block or a statement (known as
> a I in
On behalf of the Rakudo development team, I'm pleased to announce
the September 2009 development release of Rakudo Perl #21 "Seattle".
Rakudo is an implementation of Perl 6 on the Parrot Virtual Machine [1].
The tarball for the September 2009 release is available from
http://github.com/rakudo/rakud
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 1.6.0
"half-pie." Parrot (http://parrot.org/) is a virtual machine aimed
at running all dynamic languages.
Parrot 1.6.0 is available on Parrot's FTP site, or follow the
download instructions at http://parrot.org/download. For those who
wo
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:03, Kyle Hasselbacher wrote:
> Perl 5 programmers are sometimes surprised to find that 'perl -c
> strange.pl' can execute code. Imagine their surprise to find that
> 'perl6doc' does too.
>
this is why it's spelled 'perl6 --doc', which should give you some
hint that you'r
for the latest spec changes regarding this item, see
http://perlcabal.org/svn/pugs/revision/?rev=27959.
is everyone equally miserable now? ;)
~jerry
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:02, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 07:04:28AM -0700, webmas...@cosmicperl.com via RT
> wrote:
>> Infinoid helped me track the problem down to * being escaped on some of
>> the directories for the cleanup. So things like:-
>> $(PMC_DIR)\*.h
>> Need t
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 18:57, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
> Hi all. Can we change %*OPTS to %*ARGH ? By analogy with @ARGS, but
> a hash of args? I've always used that, and kind of like the amusement
> factor :).
>
>
cute, but please, no. %*OPTS is descriptive and properly huffmanized.
f
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:22, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Hats off to the designer of the gimel symbol - the associations with anarchy
> are probably right for perl6. But to be honest, a letter didnt quite inspire
> me. Since, I dont want to criticize without providing other ideas, here are
> som
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:16, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:43:17AM +0100, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl
>> wrote:
>> =item * ws
>>
>> Match whitespace between tokens.
>>
>> =item * space
>>
>> Match a single whitespace character. Hence C< > is equivalent to C<
>> + >.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 17:26, Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson
wrote:
> Google has announced this year's Summer of Code[1]. The Perl
> Foundation accepted one project (mentored by Moritz) related to Perl 6
> last year[2]. I was wondering if there are any developers interested
> in mentoring students on Perl
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 22:04, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On behalf of the Rakudo development team, I'm pleased to announce
> the February 2009 development release of Rakudo Perl #14 "Vienna".
> Rakudo is an implementation of Perl 6 on the Parrot Virtual Machine [1].
> The tarball for the Februar
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:13, Andy Lester wrote:
> Rakudo has a test suite. It also pulls in the spec test suite.
>
> If I work on some tests (as one might expect), where should I put them?
> What are the criteria for what goes where?
>
if you're testing the innermost internals of rakudo--the m
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:37, dev.null.box wrote:
> Hi...
>
> I´m used to test oneliners on the perl6 irc channel when i´m at
> home... But, at work, latetly i´m having lots of free time (this week
> has been sooo boring).
>
> But, i have irc blocked at my office (and yes, i´ve tried alternative
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 15:53, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:09 PM, kjstol wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Will Coleda via RT <
>> parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue Jul 04 19:30:44 2006, autri...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> > IMCC currently relies on a l
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:23, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:12 PM, chromatic wrote:
>> On Thursday 05 February 2009 08:57:18 jerry gay wrote:
>>
>>> we will roll our own bignum, and give users the ability to use gmp or
>>> another external libr
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:44, Reini Urban via RT
wrote:
> On Thu Jan 29 06:05:13 2009, Whiteknight wrote:
>> On Wed Dec 24 05:39:54 2008, Whiteknight wrote:
>> > On Tue Dec 23 19:02:17 2008, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
>> > > On Sat Jun 14 17:15:32 2008, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
>> > > > Would it be
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 08:45, Andrew Whitworth via RT
wrote:
> On Thu Feb 05 08:40:47 2009, particle wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 08:26, Andrew Whitworth via RT
>> wrote:
>> > 1) Are we going to be relying on libraries to handle our BigInt/BigNum
>> > implementations, or are we intending to r
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 08:26, Andrew Whitworth via RT
wrote:
> 1) Are we going to be relying on libraries to handle our BigInt/BigNum
> implementations, or are we intending to roll our own?
we can't rely on external libraries, whether for bignum, unicode, gc,
or anything else. we can detect and u
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 13:07, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:29 PM, via RT Alan Rocker
> wrote:
>> # New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
>> # Please include the string: [perl #62974]
>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
>> # http://rt.perl.org/rt
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 16:06, James Keenan via RT
wrote:
> The t/stm/*.t tests have gone away (when or whence I do not know), so I
> propose we close this ticket. Any objections?
>
the STM subsystem has been removed. close the ticket, and all other
STM-related tickets.
~jerry
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:58, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:24:46AM -0800, parti...@cvs.perl.org wrote:
>
>> -gen_sprintf_call(tc, &info, ch);
>> -ts = cstr2pstr(tc);
>> +/* check for Inf and
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:18, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> I will be making a decision (and possibly starting the
> migration) tomorrow. If anyone has any strong opinions
> one way or another, please let them be known quickly.
> I'd also prefer that we not get into long discussions at this
> time
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:37, Dave Whipp wrote:
> I could also imagine writing code that reads from an Sqlite database, and
> imposes that info onto the test. Whatever mechanism is used, I think we need
> a language-defined mechanism to supply a stable unique identifier for each
> test, so that i
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:22, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> But it is interesting to think about the case where a user wants two
> different diagnostic test messages (to all the testing gurus out there:
> do you actually want such a feature?). It shouldn't be too hard to do;
>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 13:44, Ovid
wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Moritz Lenz
>
>> * the word 'is' is overloaded in Perl 6
>>* if we export subs is() and ok(), we clutter the
>> namespace with subs with short names
>>* is() is rather imprecise; it doesn't say *h
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 07:46, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-16-01 at 09:16 -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> I agree fully about the need for a visual representation; as far as
>> the name goes I'm hoping that people will think of "Rakudo Perl" in
>> a manner to the way that we currently t
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 14:26, Eirik Berg Hanssen
wrote:
> "jerry gay" writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 13:16, Eirik Berg Hanssen
>> wrote:
>>> That doesn't look very "eager" to me.
>>>
>> it's "eager"
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 13:16, Eirik Berg Hanssen
wrote:
> pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl writes:
>
>> +C<--prelude=Perl6-autoloop-no-print>. Since eager matching is used, if you
>> +need to pass something like:
>>
>> + ++foo -bar ++foo baz ++/foo ++/foo
>>
>> +you'll end up with
>> +
>> + %+OPTS
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 08:26, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:49 AM, jerry gay wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 02:31, via RT Richard Hainsworth
>> wrote:
>> > # New Ticket Created by Richard Hainsworth
>> > # Please include t
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 02:31, via RT Richard Hainsworth
wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Richard Hainsworth
> # Please include the string: [perl #62116]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62116 >
>
>
> Array el
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 15:42, Mark Glines wrote:
> donald.hun...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I was pretty averse to adding an additional configure step myself. The
>> problem is that warnings.pm checks specifically for supported compiler flags
>> and I didn't want to include other things there. The bug
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:24, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> Thank you for the quick turnaround!
>
> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 10:55 -0800, jerry gay wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>> > It's also not
>> > obvious what a boolean n
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 17:08 +0100, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
>> +=head2 Synopsis
>> +
>> + multi sub perl6(
>> +Bool :a($autosplit),
>> +Bool :c($check-syntax),
>> +Bool :$doc,
>> +:e($execute),
>> +:$execute
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 03:30, Darren Duncan wrote:
> pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
>>
>> --name :name
>> --name=value:name
>> --name="spacy value":name«'spacy value'»
>> --name='spacy value':name«'spacy value'»
>> --na
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:36, via RT Carl Mäsak
wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
> # Please include the string: [perl #61440]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61440 >
>
>
> rakudo: * ~~ 1
> ra
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:51, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> Since Perl 5 has no REPL, I'm not sure where such a spec would go. S20,
>> maybe, since the debugger is the closest thing?
>
> or maybe S19, because it defines the console interface to the rest of
> the world. Or just pick a not-yet-used number
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:45, Mark Overmeer wrote:
> * Daniel Ruoso (dan...@ruoso.com) [081218 13:39]:
>> Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
>> > My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
>> > version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it wi
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 13:26, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Sep 08 18:43:49 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Tue Aug 19 19:28:43 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > A net total of 5 t/configure/*.t files were eliminated tonight as part
>> > of r30368 (RT 57780).
>>
>>
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:43, via RT Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
> # Please include the string: [perl #60732]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60732 >
>
>
> Fr
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 05:16, Andrew Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:50 PM, via RT Jerry Gay
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
> > # Please include the string: [perl #60624]
> > # in the subje
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 23:39, via RT Matt Kraai <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Matt Kraai
> # Please include the string: [perl #60568]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60568 >
>
>
> On
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 23:37, via RT Matt Kraai <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Matt Kraai
> # Please include the string: [perl #60566]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60566 >
>
>
> Ho
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 23:22, Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In "[perl #60350] [TODO] default __get_string method", Patrick added a
> default Object.Str() that classes can override to get custom
> stringification. Formerly, you could do that only by defining a method
> named __get_string
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> S05 always uses single curlies for closures, but throughout Parrot, code
> seems to use double curlies in PGE regexps. Why is that?
>
> That is, why this:
> m/ foo {{ say "found foo" }} /
> and not this:
> m/ foo { say "f
On 10/24/08, Elyse M. Grasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 24 October 2008, jerry gay wrote:
>> On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 0.8.0
>> "Pareto Principle." Parrot (http://parrotcode.org/) is a virtual
>> machine aimed
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 0.8.0
"Pareto Principle." Parrot (http://parrotcode.org/) is a virtual
machine aimed at running all dynamic languages.
Parrot 0.8.0 is available via CPAN, or follow the download
instructions at http://parrotcode.org/source.html. For those
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:49 AM, via RT Canol Gökel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Canol Gökel
> # Please include the string: [perl #60098]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60098 >
>
>
>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Patrick R. Michaud (via RT)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
> # Please include the string: [perl #60070]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:49 AM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Andrew Whitworth via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed Jul 30 11:57:39 2008, coke wrote:
>>> PDD19 lists this as deprecated now, changing from an [RFC
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Ovid
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would help if I sent this to the correct mailing list. Oops.
>
> Cheers,
> Ovid
>
> --- On Mon, 20/10/08, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've been doing some work integrating Perl 6 into vim
>> and now I'm trying to figure
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Mark Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached patch now includes the pir/pasm_error_output* tests in
> pir. I have also added t/pmc/complex.t. Couple of issues:
>
> 1) I am not sure how to deal with pcc_sub's so I put them into
> t/pmc/objects-pcc_sub.t
> 2)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Andrew Whitworth via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat Jun 11 13:08:49 2005, chip wrote:
>> Short version: Up through version 0.8 or so, we promise to break
>> everything constantly (but not until we have a good reason). After
>> that, we will establish versi
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Andrew Whitworth via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Jul 30 11:57:39 2008, coke wrote:
>> PDD19 lists this as deprecated now, changing from an [RFC] to
>> [DEPRECATED], re-opening from stalled.
>
> The big hangup for this ticket is that various parts of PCT
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 01:39:32PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -if $ {
>> +my $name := $;
>> +if $name {
>> [...]
>> -PAST::Val.new( :value(~$[0]) )
>> +PAST::
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Allison Randal via RT wrote:
>
> > jerry gay wrote:
> > >
> > > .\src\pmc\float.c(3340) : warning C4204: nonstandard extension used
> > > : non-cons
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
>> jerry gay wrote:
>> A combined harness is much better in terms of reporting.
>
> Yes.
>
a combined harness is much easier now that we require T::H 3.
anybody wi
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many people who try out Rakudo want to inform us about hanging or
> failing "make spectest" - which is expected to fail until we implement
> all of Perl 6 that is currently tested.
>
> Therefore I'd like to rename 'spectest_r
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 01:48:17PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
>
>> In general, filesystems are case-insensitive, not platforms. I believe Mac
>> OS
>> X's Hateful File System Plus is one offender, though you can use UFS inst
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:00 PM, via RT Andy Dougherty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
> # Please include the string: [perl #59658]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59658 >
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Elyse M. Grasso
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My company sells an application that links a bugtracking tool with an SCM tool
> so that, for example, the files changed for each bug are recorded in the
> bugtracking tool. It is currently written in (mostly) non-object-o
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 07:22:28PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Log:
>> [rakudo] implement 'package' package declarator
>>
>> Modified: trunk/languages/perl6/perl6.pir
>> ==
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Patrick R. Michaud (via RT)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
> # Please include the string: [perl #59374]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?i
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 September 2008 11:22:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Modified:
>>trunk/docs/book/ch04_pir_subroutines.pod
>>trunk/docs/book/ch09_hlls.pod
>>
>> Log:
>> [Book] Add some basic info about VTables and HLL n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:06:44AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 0
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 07:34 -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> > "Aggregating coroutine" and "aggregating yield" aren't nearly as zippy
>> > as 'gather' and 'take', but they're more meaningful to a broader
>> > audien
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Sep 16 15:00:24 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 14:47:58 NotFound wrote:
>>
>> > > It certainly shouldn't segfault. But, the question is: why does it
>> > > segfault at 206 par
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:27 PM, via RT Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
> # Please include the string: [perl #58934]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58934 >
>
>
>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:14 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Sep 16 00:08:29 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Monday 15 September 2008 20:06:11 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>> > See patch attached. The patch eliminates smartlink-related code from
>> > Parrot, but d
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:47 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution. I think
> that it has remained unresolved for so long because the original post
> originally called for two steps: (a) removal from Configure.pl of
> c
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) Do abstract base classes as currently implemented in Parrot serve any
> useful purpose? If not, eliminate them.
>
can they be replaced by roles?
~jerry
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Will Coleda via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu Jun 26 11:01:00 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> chromatic wrote:
>>
>> > T::H 3 is only a requirement for people who want to type 'make
>> smolder' (and
>> > eventually I hope 'make smoke'), so probing for it w
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
>
>> On Wed May 10 11:01:34 2006, stmpeters wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm taking a look at it. I should have something working this evening
>> > for the configs. Adding the HAS_BLAH
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:59 AM, via RT Ronald Schmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Ronald Schmidt
> # Please include the string: [perl #58610]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58610 >
>
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This must make the following syntax rule illegal:
>>>
>>> target = null
>>>
>>> because if "null" is declared
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerry gay wrote:
>>>
>>> #+ and #- is lisp so I don't want to destroy #+ the syntax rules.
>>> #IF(): is quite short and easy to read.
>>>
>> i know it was all
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerry gay schrieb:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll go now for something like
>>>
>>> #IF(key1|
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll go now for something like
>
> #IF(key1|key2&(key3&!key4))
> #IFNOT(key1|key2&(key3&!key4))
>
> And probably a shortcut for the negative else clause, like
> #IF(cygwin):
> #ELSE:
>
> #+ and #- is lisp so I don't want to d
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:39 PM, James Keenan via RT
>> 4. Parrot::OpsRenumber::renum_op_map_file() has been revised so that it
>> will behave properly before Parrot 1.0 -- when deletion of opcodes is
>> still permitted --
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running 'make test' now fills the main directory of the repository with junk
> files like:
>
> test_98093.out
> test_37653.c
> test_98093.ldo
> test_97159.c
>
> The offending tests need to be modified t
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Jesse Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [List-CC changed]
>
> On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Reini Urban wrote:
>
>> Bob Rogers schrieb:
>>>
>>> On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 0.7.0 "Severe
>>> Macaw." Parrot (http://parrotcode.org/) is
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:50 PM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Mich
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will Coleda wrote:
>>
>>> The eventual goal of this cleanup is to get these tests running via
>>> smolder to give core developers more feedback on
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:07:46 -0700
>
> . . .
>
> It seems then that we have two remaining options:
>
> 1. Don't run codingstd as part of smolder.
>
> 2. Differe
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:38 AM, via RT Carl Mäsak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I added two tests in t/operators/smartmatch.t to exercise the correct
> behaviour.
>
thanks for the tests, but remember rakudo won't run these until
they're moved to t/spec/.
~jerry
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 3:50 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat Aug 09 10:31:37 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Saturday 09 August 2008 06:33:46 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>> > > What purpose remains, then, for either tools/dev/ops_renum.mak or
>> my
>> > > alternati
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jon Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But are 'twas and -x valid identifiers? IMHO, they should not be.
>
no, indeed they are not, because they don't start with underscore or
alpha. that's why they won't work.
~jerry
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Worthington wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just been looking at the time op, and what it returns is somewhat
>> platform specific.
>>
>> * On Win32, it's the number of seconds since January 1, 1601
>
> If I remember co
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rakudo is currently failing t\spec\S12-class\attributes.t. This turns out
> not to be an issue with attributes, but rather exceptions. The test does:
>
> my $c = Counter.new();
> try {
> $c.x
> }
> ok($!, 'n
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>>
>> I think basically the question remans; is there any way we could do
>> without the :unique_reg?
>>
> Yes:
>
> 1) Add the reference-taking op and register reference PMC to the Parrot
> core.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Yaakov Belch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a little language that I wrote some time ago, I found it very useful to
> let the // operator catch exceptions:
>
> f(x) // g(y) does:
> * If f(x) returns a defined value, use this value.
> * If f(x) returns an undefined v
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 16:19 -0400, Michael Peters wrote:
>> We also need to think about deprecation cycles. If you deprecate a
>> feature in 1 version and then it disappears in the next then the time
>> between when my
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:25 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Jul 29 11:01:12 2008, particle wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> the failing test:
>> t/steps/auto_ctags-01ok 1/31
>> # Failed test 'Got expected result'
>> # at t/steps/auto_ctags-01.t line 65.
>>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:28 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have prepared a patch which represents an 'svn diff' between trunk and
> the 'parallel' branch at the point of the branch's inception. Rather
> than swamp your inboxes, I'm posting it here:
>
> http://thenceforward
1 - 100 of 608 matches
Mail list logo
