On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Will Coleda via RT
wrote:
> Sorry for the delay - this patch had stalled waiting for review due to a
> ticketing system
> changeover, and in the meantime, no longer applies cleanly against parrot
> HEAD.
>
> Can you rebase this patch and resubmit it to https://t
# New Ticket Created by "gabriele renzi"
# Please include the string: [perl #61088]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61088 >
the current HLLCompiler infrastructure seems to be an incomplete R
# New Ticket Created by "gabriele renzi"
# Please include the string: [perl #61086]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61086 >
the default grammar for a newly generated language shell contains
# New Ticket Created by "gabriele renzi"
# Please include the string: [perl #61020]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61020 >
This happens wither with a line like
1.size
or simply
size
The er
# New Ticket Created by "gabriele renzi"
# Please include the string: [perl #60976]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60976 >
The bug is visibile with the following line
subset GenderStr of Str
Jonathan Lang wrote:
From S02:
--
Perl 6 includes a system of B to mark the fundamental
structural type of a variable:
$ scalar (object)
@ ordered array
% unordered hash (associative array)
& code/rule/token/regex
:: package/module/class/role/subset/enum/type/grammar
Hi everyone,
A small request about the cached trait for functions that makes them
memoized: would it be possible to make it parametric?
I think it would be nice to have at least one variant
sub foo is cached(max=>$size)
caching just the first $size results.
Maybe it could also be useful to
Hi everyone,
I don't want to argue about the design of perl6[1], I just wonder: why
the semicolon is still needed in the end of lines in perl6?
I can think of different reasons (history, readability, easier parsing
of multiline statements, force people to write one-line functions to
avoid ty
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Does it mean that basically the assertion is a character/string
property instead of the character/string itself?
No, it is a zero-width assertion. `at(1)` means the position
“between” the 0th and 1th character of the string.
I see thank you
Also, what is the correct way
Hello,
sorry about the dumb question but I'm not sure I understand the
assertion.
If I write something like
my $s="hello"
s//a/
I expected it to give me
"hallo"
whereas it give ms
"haello".
Does it mean that basically the assertion is a character/string property
instead of the character
Hi everyone,
I wonder: why does take inside a gather structure returns undef?
I think it would be nicer if it could return the taken value, so that,
for example one can write something like:
say take 2
or like:
while cond($n) {
my $res = compute($n)
$n /= take($res)
}
there is a reas
Ovid ha scritto:
I definitely think your solution is cleaner, but I'd be more inclined
to see multiple solutions to problems rather than clearing out previous
work. Not only does this follow the spirit of TIMTOWTDI, but it also
allows the tests to cover a wider range of behavior.
of course tw
Larry Wall ha scritto:
but the autocall into MAIN is not yet implemented. You can emulate by
putting something like this as the last line in your file:
MAIN(@ARGS), exit if $?FILE eq $*PROGRAM_NAME;
or maybe
MAIN(@ARGS), exit unless caller;
if/when that works as in Perl 5. When the
Larry Wall ha scritto:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:40:44PM +0200, Gaal Yahas wrote:
: > I think it should be possible and nice to use a macro (possibly a
: > standard subroutine, I'm not sure) like
: >
: > testing {
: > ok foo;
: > }
: >
: > would it make sense or I'm just crazy?
:
: I like
Hi people,
I implemented 13 from scratch because I didn't know it was already
solved, in this way
sub encode_direct([EMAIL PROTECTED] is copy) returns Str {
my ($packed, $count);
while @array {
if @array[0] eq @array[1] {
$count++;
}
else {
$packed
Hi everyone,
supposing that I want to keep code and tests in one single file, is
there a common idiom to do that?
At the moment I'm going with something like:
if $?FILE == $*PROGRAM_NAME {
use Test;
plan 1;
ok foo();
}
but this seem unnecessarily verbose.
Is there some standard idio
Steffen Schwigon ha scritto:
Hi!
gabriele renzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi everyone!
I solved the (easy) problem 32, implementing gcd($a,$b).
You can check the code in the repository or on the web[1]
I looked at [1]. What's the purpose of "multi" in this case?
(Mayb
Hi everyone!
I solved the (easy) problem 32, implementing gcd($a,$b).
You can check the code in the repository or on the web[1]
But while writing this I noticed that a function written as
sub gcd(Int $a, Int $b)
still accepts float/rational values in input.
I think I read once that a variable
Ovid ha scritto:
Ah, nice to see someone else tackling the problems.
yes, it was such a nice idea :)
Assuming the tests
pass (I can't check this at work) and you have a commit bit, check it
in!
they pass here, but I have no commit bit, it's ok if I do a darcs push?
(I prefer it over svn)
Hi everyone, and happy new year!
I'm an almost complete newbie to Perl6 and I'm not that good at Perl5
either, but I thought playing with these problems could be fun, so I
tried to solve #28.
My solution is attached, it seems to work, but I'd like to know from
people more expert than me if t
Gilbert R. Röhrbein ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm new to Perl 6 (and perl).
Is there a way to check inside a gather-block if something was allready
taken? I thought it would look like one of the following, but it doesnt
work on my pugs 6.2.13.
gather
{
for 1..100
{
take $_ unless @_.conta
21 matches
Mail list logo
