I may be able to lay my hands on an alpha running FreeBSD (I don't
yet know version numbers). Is there any interest in running smokes
on that platform combination, or is that already well covered?
http://cpanplus.keradel.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db.cgi?os_fil=All&osver_fil=All&archi_fil=All&cc_fil=All&c
Hi,
I just start smoke on this "top100" with cpanplus.
Why, as you display docs, bugs and rating, you didn't display link to
cpan testers results ?
Regards,
--
Alain BARBET
Ok, I patch this for use the great yaml I found one the new site, but
there is missing info into the yaml file:
Can't you include os name and os version that can be found in all reports:
osname=solaris, osvers=2.8, archname=sun4-solaris
This is displayed in the old interface with all result, now
But some problems ...
We use in CPANPLUS old interface, old url to fetch reports about a dist.
So there is no longuer report from CPANPLUS testers since yesterday.
Which interface is this? We can probably fake it with a mod_rewrite
rule if you tell me the details.
The patch is already done. But if
http://search.cpan.org/author/LBROCARD/CPAN-WWW-Testers/
http://testers.astray.com/
I just see that testers.cpan.org now use your interface. Cl. Faaast.
But some problems ...
We use in CPANPLUS old interface, old url to fetch reports about a dist.
So there is no longuer report from CPANPLUS t
The uploaded file
Test-Smoke-Database-1.14.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/A/AL/ALIAN/Test-Smoke-Database-1.14.tar.gz
size: 45076 bytes
md5: a5aac8a73f06e47af430307cd94b199b
1.14 2003/08/19 10:37:24 alian
- FORMAT OF DATABASE UPDATED ! (two cols added, one moved
Comments welcome, Leon
About order of v-string:
It would be good in details results that 1.18 would be first before 1.2.
Eg:
1.18 (2 PASSes)
97757 PASS sun4-solaris
97976 PASS i586-linux
1.17 (1 FAIL)
97620 FAIL sun4-solaris
1.16 (1 FAIL)
97484 FAIL sun4-solaris
in place of
1.3 (3 PASSes)
22
Thus, I think that my website is correct in sorting the version
numbers. 1.2 should be later than 1.18. I think your versioning system
is wrong ;-)
Ok as this is not *my* versioning system, I will explain.
I use CVS, and extract version from something like:
$VERSION = ('$Revision: 1.18 $ ' =~ /(\d+
Test-Smoke-Database-1.12
http://cpanplus.keradel.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db.cgi
Comments welcome,
--
Alain BARBET
My point is that the CPAN Testers reports for fails have the output of
make test, eg:
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/96865
... but passes don't:
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/96886
This is inconsistent and we're throwing information away. I say put it
in all the tim
Here a patch for what I just say ...
HTH,
--
Alain BARBET
diff -ru Devel-Cover-0.20-old/BUGS Devel-Cover-0.20/BUGS
--- Devel-Cover-0.20-old/BUGS Sat Oct 5 19:16:10 2002
+++ Devel-Cover-0.20/BUGS Wed Jul 30 11:29:07 2003
@@ -1,2 +1,6 @@
- Code in BEGIN and END blocks is not reported.
- D
Sorry, an another part of doc missing: How use Pod::Coverage from
Devel::Cover ?
Thank you,
--
Alain BARBET
But with this method, i've two cover_db created:
saturne:~/project/CPAN/Test/Smoke/Database/t$ grep chdir *
2normal_report.t:chdir(dirname($0));
3hmbrand_report.t:chdir(dirname($0));
It doesn't seem like this !
With another module without chdir, I've only one cover_db database created.
S_PERL_SWITCHES: (with bash)
$ export HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES=\
"-MDevel::Cover=-ignore,t/,-select,blib/lib"
$ make test.
But with this method, i've two cover_db created:
ls -l cover_db/ t/cover_db/
cover_db/:
total 40
-rw-r--r--1 alianusers 39217 jui 27 18:48 cover.4
Out of interest, is there a reason http://testers.cpan.org/
is so slow?
Huge size of database ?
15 matches
Mail list logo
