ely small
>> language.
>
> Whatever Perl 6 will turn out to be, it won't be a small language.
And just to complement the many answers:
There *are* small variants of Perl6: Perlito and NQP.
Kind regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
to hear comments and ideas to apply them to my
Perl5 benchmarking.
Kind regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
work. The language has everything I
need, I just can't hack all the things I regularly use from CPAN.
Kind regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
ormal” software, spilled over to
formerly “untestable” software like Web applications and is even
getting momentum on other difficult areas like Operating Systems.
So I think the test suite is a strong Pro matching the zeitgeist.
Kind regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Dresden Perl Mongers
istory of
> mankind. If this was a real world project it would have been dead
> sometime ago.
Don't worry too much.
Python 3000 took about 8 years.
(Though not sure about betas for testing.)
Kind regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
n doing that.
Kind regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
st wanted to mention it.
Find it in the Pugs repository.
Kind regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> writes:
> If Sun's propaganda about Dtrace :
> http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/dtrace/ is anywhere near true
Which I can confirm. DTrace *is* cool.
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
Deutsc
eciated.
Kind regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
Deutscher Perl-Workshop <http://www.perl-workshop.de/>
Hi!
Why not taking a camel with 6 humps?
Just joking, could not resist. :-)
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
Deutscher Perl-Workshop <http://www.perl-workshop.de/>
and collect all the operators
and descriptions from the synopses into one common place?
If we had such a collection we would then format it in a second step
into a structured collection and the third step is a frontend to that,
the easiest part, IMHO.
Step 1 is the real challenge, isn't it?
S
g the
output contains the problem from question 1.
3. Which test file is the real one:
pugs/t/builtins/perl.t
or
pugs/t/builtins/perl2.t ?
They are similar but not identical.
(Greeti+Tha)nX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <http://renormalist.net>
Dresden Perl Mongers &
gabriele renzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steffen Schwigon ha scritto:
>> I looked at [1]. What's the purpose of "multi" in this case?
>> (Maybe you wanted to write it as more than one subs, did you?)
>
> look the comment:
>
> # Yet, it should be
ccepted but worked
similar to typeless code in Perl5. I'm not sure about the current
state.
Anyway, in your example I hadn't expected a value coercion (from 10.1
to 10), but something like an error if the type doesn't match. But I
can't find the right place in the synopses to ver
oesn't really work but at least it gets you a step
further. Try it and maybe you have the next idea as you maybe
know Wx better than I do.
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
Deutscher Perl-Workshop <http://www.perl-workshop.de/>
s. I'm just not sure where it belongs. Maybe near
t/perl5/import.t --> go for it, if you dare. :-)
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
subroutine found: "&Wx::SimpleApp"
>at wxtest.p6 line 2, column 1-28
>
> Is the perl6 wrong?
>
> I have also tested
> use perl5:Wx ;
Maybe an additional
use perl5:Wx::SimpleApp;
? I'm just guessing...
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
our Dresden Perl Mongers server. Just ask me, now or in
future. Might be good, for instance, if the projects feel too early or
experimental to be hosted on major Perl/Pugs/Feather/Sourceforge
resources.
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <http://renormalist.net>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
ys:
http://www.perl.org/yapc/2002/movies/themovie/
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
nd the word
"CGI". Because of the word. Not the api.
IMHO. Of course. :-)
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I checked and indeed the twigils don't work. My test source file
> (which worked correctly some time ago) also highlights wrong. It's for
> sure a bug I introduced.
I now did some things on cperl-mode (eg. syncing with ori
Trey Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In a message dated Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Steffen Schwigon writes:
>> First you could try an older revision, I recommend r7845 or r10822 of
>> pugs repository.
>
> No, neither of those work. To see what I'm talking about,
n't know about. But it's a
very big "maybe". Having one mode for all perl versions and for both
major Emacs variants with high backwards compatibility is a big plus
and there is much knowledge in original cperl-mode that progresses
itself, even as we speak. Currently I wouldn
odEnglish#Haskell
to get a general idea of the easiness, although it's not RedHat-driven.
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
compare Perl6 with Perl5, not Perl6 with AnyOtherLanguage,
because that's just the same old discussion since Perl's birthday.
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
list
too and I will help you with experimenting, but I'm currently, erm,
well, occupied with @otherstuff ("the same excuse as every year").
If you start experimenting and writing down something, expect me to
follow you.
If we know and document something in an easy understandable
so if anyone wants to help with
this little project, feel free to contact me. Or just hack away on it
from inside Pugs.
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
now. After we rotate back to
the world, we're gonna miss not having any principle around that's
worth stealing."
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steffen Schwigon schrieb:
>> At least the many keywords seem to be necessary to map the complexity
>> of different paradigms possible in Perl6. Multimethods are not just
>> overloading as in C++. Second, the different ke
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> multi sub talk () { say 'Loose Talk Is Noose Talk.'; }
> multi sub talk (String $msg) { say $msg; }
> multi sub talk (String $msg, Int $times) { say $msg x $times; }
BTW, because we are just on-topic, can someone explai
of ugly
"parameter checking if-cascades".
multi sub talk () { say 'Loose Talk Is Noose Talk.'; }
multi sub talk (String $msg) { say $msg; }
multi sub talk (String $msg, Int $times) { say $msg x $times; }
talk("Hi", 10);
talk("Hello");
talk;
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
Ask Bjørn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Woah, we are getting really far away from talking about perl6
> here...
Kind of a usenet law or corollary? "Every discussion about wikis ends
in a discussion about the best wiki syntax."
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL
guage experts as the number of different languages you use. I think
it's about making programming more borderless, making the use of
libraries similar to todays typical use of whole programs,
independently of the language it's written in.
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
s your problem because it's already built into the
problem, just use it.
Perl5 is already gluey enough to not force you into a decicion for
*the only one* technology. Perl6 shouldn't change that.
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
"A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-24 13:55]:
>> "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > * Martin Kjeldsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-24 12:25]:
>> >> I und
tly assign the result back via "%hash{$_} = ..." or similar.
AFAIR.
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
if they are
worth it.
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
gi-bin/twiki/view/PM/PugsFirstBlood
GreetinX
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
g code, so the healthy effects
of Pair programming should also be exploited for them. So feel free to
combine TDD with Pair Programming, but don't divide the pair.
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
have to call ./Build before "prove",
which can be annoying and/or difficult to remember.
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
s a "build_requires" option in Build.PL, but
does the CPAN(PLUS).pm know about that option and really only download
and use those "build_requires" temporarily during module build/test or
does it fully install them?
Thanks,
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
41 matches
Mail list logo
