Re: [perl #47888] [TODO] gc - possibly merge gmc branch back into trunk

Hi Coke, Andrew, Chromatic, I have not considered this branch as a candidate for research on the Parrot GC, but had a look @ it. As it seems, it wouldn't be of much use as its *quite* old. Regards, Senaka On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Will Coleda via RT < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon J

[perl #53496] Re: [bug] Build failure with G++

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #53496] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53496 > Attaching patch No. 2 for C++ Build Issue. I still need to resolve

[perl #53112] [PATCH] Fixing C++ build break issue when using GMP

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #53112] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53112 > The provided patch resolves the C++ build break caused by gmp.h. Re

Re: [perl #52916] [PATCH] Making NCI test C++ compatible

Hi Mark, What does the fix to 't/codingstd/c_indent.t' do? Does it ignore anything inside #ifdef __cplusplus blocks? Regards, Senaka On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Mark Glines via RT < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu Apr 17 09:03:57 2008, infinoid wrote: > > On Tue Apr 15 02:58:18 2008, [E

[perl #52916] [PATCH] Making NCI test C++ compatible

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #52916] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52916 > Index: s

C++ test failure caused due to dll linkage errors

Hi all, It seems that most C++ test failures are caused due to dll linkage errors. Adding the extern "C" block to each header will circumvent these. Regards, Senaka

Re: [perl #52874] Re: [bug] Build failure with G++

Hi Mark, Yes, if possible that would be great. Another is to change, key_next(PARROT_INTERP, ARGIN(const PMC *key)) to key_next(PARROT_INTERP, ARGIN(PMC *key)). Regards, Senaka On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Mark Glines via RT < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon Apr 14 04:50:02 2008, [EMAI

Re: [perl #52888] [PATCH] Improvements to towers of hanoi example

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Senaka Fernando" (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:38:22 -0700 > > # New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" > # Please include the stri

Fwd: C++ build succeeded, but with some tests failed

__cplusplus define missing 3. or due to inline/readline 4. or may be my tweaks Regards, Senaka On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > >

[perl #50068] [BUG] Configure doesn't detect backtrace* on ubuntu gutsy

I don't see any issue on my Gutsy build, and it seems that all tests successfully pass. Therefore, perhaps this issue seems to be resolved. Regards, Senaka

[perl #52888] [PATCH] Improvements to towers of hanoi example

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #52888] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52888 > Hi all, I would like to make two improvements to the towers of han

[perl #52886] [BUG] including gmp.h causes build break in C++ build

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #52886] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52886 > Including gmp.h causes build break in C++ build on Ubuntu Gutsy. T

[perl #52874] Re: [bug] Build failure with G++

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #52874] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52874 > Attaching patch No. 2 for C++ Build Issue. I still need to resolve

[perl #52876] Re: [bug] Build failure with G++

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #52876] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52876 > Hi all, [#perl 52874] is a continuation of this issue. I guess I r

Re: [perl #52854] [bug] Build failure with G++

Hi all, [#perl 52874] is a continuation of this issue. I guess I replied to the wrong mail. Regards, Senaka On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:50 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:40:01AM +0530, Senaka Fernando wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at

Re: [perl #52854] [bug] Build failure with G++

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:33 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 13 April 2008 08:14:11 Senaka Fernando wrote: > > > The build of Parrot fails with g++, which is a possible indication that > it > > fails on other C++ compilers too. I have attached

[perl #52854] [bug] Build failure with G++

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #52854] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52854 > The build of Parrot fails with g++, which is a possible indication

Re: Comparison of Harmony GC_Gen vs. Parrot

Hi all, I have almost finished comparing the two interfaces of Harmony and Parrot. However, I'm not 100% sure on whether I got everything right, but I believe that most of it is. Therefore, it would be really great if you could review the wiki page and let me know whether it is correct and precise

Comparison of Harmony GC_Gen vs. Parrot

Hi all, I have almost finished comparing the two interfaces of Harmony and Parrot. However, I'm not 100% sure on whether I got everything right, but I believe that most of it is. Therefore, it would be really great if you could review the wiki page and let me know whether it is correct and precise

[perl #52510] [PATCH] global.c fails C++ build

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #52510] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52510 > Index:

[perl #52500] [patch] use of C++ keywords as argument names breaks build in C++

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #52500] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52500 > Use of C++ keywords as argument names breaks build in C++. Attached

Need info on Stack Enumeration

Hi Chromatic, do you trace the PMC object roots on the Stack within the GC? or in other words is there any Stack enumeration? Regards, Senaka

[perl #52332] [PATCH] Fix for using --gc=libc

just making a dummy call on it, just to make sure it is used Regards, Senaka On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:28 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 31 March 2008 14:10:13 Senaka Fernando wrote: > > > There is a build failure when using the configure option --gc=libc.

[perl #52332] [PATCH] Fix for using --gc=libc

# New Ticket Created by "Senaka Fernando" # Please include the string: [perl #52332] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52332 > There is a build failure when using the configure option --gc=libc.