tax/semantic of that.
greetings,
Robin Redeker
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
ie. ./method ()).
>
> I wasn't thinking 'cool', I was thinking 'visually distinctive and
> mnemonic'. I actually think o. is cooler.
Yes, i would like o. more too. At least it doesn't introduce
a completly meaningless '/' preceded by a '.'.
Robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:07:24AM -0400, Stevan Little wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2005, at 2:10 AM, Robin Redeker wrote:
> >And what will be the default syntax to call
> >a method on self? If everyone has completly other
> >preferences about this, for example this horrible ./m
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:50:35AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:10:00AM +0200, Robin Redeker wrote:
> > And what will be the default syntax to call
> > a method on self? If everyone has completly other
> > preferences about this, for example t
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:50:35AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:10:00AM +0200, Robin Redeker wrote:
> > And what will be the default syntax to call
> > a method on self? If everyone has completly other
> > preferences about this, for example t
6_anymore;
?
thanks,
Robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:08:17PM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:32:37PM +0200, Robin Redeker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i just wanted to ask what was about the method calling syntax on
> > $self, and why does
> >
> >me
Hi,
i just wanted to ask what was about the method calling syntax on
$self, and why does
method ()
not work for calling a method on $self? (like in C++)
cya,
Robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
รข.
However, you don't need finalizers for that style of management.
(I'm not arguing for timely destruction, I am just wondering about the
theoreticel usefulness of a finalizer method, and cannot find any).
Most of this thought is from portland pattern repository's wiki:
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?FinalizeInsteadOfProperDestructor
robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
s called.
>
Will there be destructors on imcc or language level? And if so, what
would the purpose of them be?
cya,
robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
I just wanted to correct my small example:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:00:53PM +0200, Robin Redeker wrote:
> > Robin Redeker writes:
> And with explicit resource handling (without timely destruction) it may be:
>
>{
> my $s = new CoolClass;
> ...
>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:43:32PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 5:40 PM +0200 4/27/05, Robin Redeker wrote:
> >Just for the curious me: What was the design decision behind the GC
> >solution? Was refcounting that bad? Refcounting gives a more global
> >speed hit
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:59:05PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Robin Redeker writes:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 12:33:30PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > > I think, more importantly, they don't understand what they're
> > > getting in return for giving [refc
a little overhead, but
in a fast and deterministic O(1) way.
And how do you want to implement glib objects with parrot?
They are refcounted.
robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 02:27:58PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Robin Redeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Any hints when looking for functions that 'maybe' go into the API?
>
> API's aren't finished yet and are extended more or less on dema
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Robin Redeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > 1. i wonder how to load bytecode from the memory to parrot when
> > embedding it. i've read embed.pod and couldn't find a function that let me
>
struction. (correct me there..)
So, what would happen if i have many marked objects and call subroutines
often?
Or are there any other plans? What do other languages do, which
have refcounting and want to port to parrot?
cya,
Robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
lping this
project.
cya
(Hope i'm not sounding that foolish)
--
Robin Redeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.x-paste.de/
t i wonder which parts of parrot are stable enough and which
part of the IMCC language is finished and wont change much in future?
cya,
Robin
--
Robin Redeker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19 matches
Mail list logo
