Has anyone encountered some really odd errors, namely status 500 errors when
surfing to ASP.Net files only through means of WWW::Mechanize?
Andrew Potozniak
Administrative Computing
Student Assistant
State Unive
Maybe daily or weekly reminders would be helpful, because I know most of the
time when I go home from work I rarely to almost never thing about the
Phalanx project. I just think there is a huge lack of communication between
Hoplites. It would be nice to have a system where you can ask other
hopli
> > > Encouraging simple status reports, say monthly, may help ensure
> > > progress.
>
> > Or...we could set some deadlines...like have 50% of your
> module tested
> by YAPC, and/or possibly have some incentives.
>
> Say "..50%.. of modules tested by YAPC or we cancel the conference"?
> Encouraging simple status reports, say monthly, may help
> ensure progress.
Or...we could set some deadlines...like have 50% of your module tested by
YAPC, and/or possibly have some incentives.
~~Andrew
I've done a little work on Params::Validate and David Rolsky (its author)
was more than enthused to have someone else working on Params::Validate with
him. I was given the task to rewrite the existing tests to use Test::More.
I haven't been able to work on it as much as I would have liked to and I
I have been trying in JavaScript and Perl to write a framed page to allow a
user to click through a website and validate it as they wish using framework
I built that uses to W3C's validation services. So I have a top frame which
is like the control panel (you can tell the bottom frame where to go
Hi,
I was wondering if there was anything built in Perl (a Module) that
will take in a Perl file and parse that into an abstract or concrete syntax
tree. I searched around cpan for a bit and couldn't find what I was looking
for. If anyone is wondering what I'm talking about there is a ni
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:03 PM
> To: Potozniak, Andrew
> Cc: 'chromatic'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: thinking about variable context for like()
>
>
> On
the "Reply-All" option)
> -Original Message-
> From: chromatic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:24 PM
> To: Potozniak, Andrew
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: thinking about variable context for like()
>
>
> O
is the
separation between your function's mechanizm and policy.
Toodles,
~~Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 4:24 AM
> To: Potozniak, Andrew
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
I would suggest something along the lines of:
&like_html(actual_value, expected_regex, max_chars_to_output,
string_description);
You could probably "steal" most of the code for this from Test::More's like
function and add in the functionality for outputting less than or equal to
max_chars
When will all of this phalanxing start? I'm excited about it and I can't
wait to get my hands dirty. Hopefully with school and all I will have time
to help you guys out.
BTW
phalanxing - the action of testing and improving CPAN and Perl. (or
something to that effect)
:-p
~~Andrew
> -Or
>
> Personal and asthetic style nits cannot be part of any code
> analysis that
> claims to be non-partisan or even wishes to exist. It will
> make the analysis worthless since nobody will agree on what
> you feel is "good" style. Stick to choices that don't rely
> on asthetics.
>
> Consi
Since we're on the topic of scrutinizing CPAN distributions I would like to
contribute something that I do not like in some of the distributions that I
have come across. I don't know if it has been brought up on this thread yet
but here it goes:
1) I do not like in-module POD as it is ha
-Original Message-
From: chromatic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:56 PM
To: Potozniak, Andrew
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: passing arguments to tests
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 09:46 AM, Potozniak, Andrew wrote:
>> Correct me
>I'm afraid your code won't work.
As stated below I got it to work with my example :-p
>Okay, you've subclassed a functional module. But this means that
>you'll be >passing the package name as the first argument, not a test
>name. This will generate a "this >test does not exist" warning with
iak
Administrative Computing
Student Assistant
State University of New York at Buffalo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
645-3587 x 7123
---
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Savige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:56 PM
To: Po
>>Fergal Daly wrote:
>> Hi,
>> is it possible with Test::Harness and MakeMaker to pass arguments
>> to my test scripts? I think it's not but I just want to check for sure.
>> The module I'm working on is getting a new "optimised" mode so I'd like
>> to be able to run all the tests twice, once
I'm getting into testing a lot more lately and I realize that Test::More
doesn't do what I would like it to do and thus I'm creating my own test
class. I took the code from Test::More namely the _export_to_level(),
plan(), import(), and builder(). I know what builder is doing so I don't
need any
19 matches
Mail list logo
