alternatives; but strdup isn't one
of those functions. A call to strdup is actually compiled into a call to
_strdup (via linker tricks (I assume) in oldnames.lib), so there's no
difference at all in implementation or safety.
--
Philip Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ost people care about speed more
than predictable/correct output.)
It seems like the only way to stay safe is to work around the optimiser,
presumably by testing bits or using library functions or writing
assembly code (e.g. with 'fxam' on x86).
Ron
--
Philip Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ively
slow, since its concept of memory is slightly incompatible with
Parrot's, and anybody who wants speed can use a native C compiler, so I
can stop worrying about it? :-)
Thanks,
--
Philip Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
