;? Currently it's "perl6" but will it
be just "perl" eventually?
3. Can I just rename S26.pod to perl6pod.pod and be done with it? :)
Best regards,
--
Offer Kaye
perl6.pod
Description: Binary data
perl6doc.pod
Description: Binary data
perl6intro.pod
Description: Binary data
Hi,
The link to the S26 Synopsys on http://perlcabal.org/syn/ points to
http://perlcabal.org/syn/S26.html which is a broken link - would it be
possible to fix this?
My apologies if this is the wrong place to ask this question.
Best regards,
--
Offer Kaye
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
>
> Dunno, but I just tried that command and had no problems at all.
Same here now, worked like a charm this time. Must have been a temp
network problem.
Thanks all,
--
Offer Kaye
me?
--
Offer Kaye
;=pod" is too confusing - you
need to worry about whitespace there too which is bad - but at least
you could not close that multi-line by accident.
Please stick with what works, don't build a solution that is worse
than the problem it is meant to solve...
Best regards,
--
Offer Kaye
ink about it, I seem to recall reading somewhere about
dual-life modules not being listed in the main Perl page. Dual-life
modules are those that are both core AND are distributed seperatly on
CPAN. Don't remember where I saw that, and don't know if it's true or
relevant here...
Cheers,
--
Offer Kaye
is that *easier* than installing a pre-compiled package?
Of course I'm assuming that the PPM method *works* as intended...
obviously it doesn't... but in an ideal world, all else being equal,
PPM would be easier, IMHO.
Cheers,
--
Offer Kaye
On 2/6/06, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>
> http://perldoc.perl.org/perl58delta.html#New-Modules-and-Pragmata
>
I see what you mean... what threw me off was that it is not listed under:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/perl-5.8.8/
Cheers,
--
Offer Kaye
On 2/5/06, Offer Kaye wrote:
>
> [3]
> http://ppm.activestate.com/BuildStatus/5.8-windows/windows-5.8/Scalar-List-Util-1.15.txt
>
Something funky here...
Last night I looked at "Scalar-List-Util"... but the correct name as
Tyler said is "Scalar-List-Utils", with a
t DLLs etc., I don't think any of
Blizzard's 5.5 million customers have ever had a problem installing
WoW because they were missing a DLL from some Office version... Just
to give an example... why should a PPM package be any different? Yes,
I'm a noob when it comes to these things, sorry :)
Cheers,
--
Offer Kaye
On 2/5/06, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2006 13:54, Tels wrote:
> > Moin Offer Kaye (sorry, can't identify which part of your name which is
> > the one you are called by :-)
> >
>
> Just for everybody's information:
>
> Offer is his first
y of out date..
I guess that many more people use Perl on Linux boxes, but there are
still uses for Perl on Windows... ;-)
It would be wonderful to be able to fully use CPAN on Windows, with
the same level of comfort that today's pre-packged PPM files already
provide.
Thanks,
--
Offer Kaye
12 matches
Mail list logo
