On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:15:49PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nicholas Clark > wrote:
>
> > I don't know what file would be safer. Maybe mem?
>
>
> None of them. There's no guarantee that /proc exists (non-SVR4 commercial
> Unixes), or that it is in any way
On Thu Apr 05 14:56:03 2012, pmichaud wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 01:46:53PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> > r: say ~(1, 2, 6 ... *)[10]
> > rakudo 4373f0: OUTPUT«»
> > eeks
> > no, that particular thing isn't in RT
> > * masak submits rakudobug
>
> For the moment, I'm going to argue Rakudo
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:21:18PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> >The for loop inside trace_mem_block steps right over it. This if fails:
> >
> >/* Do a quick approximate range check by bit-masking */
> >if ((ptr & mask) == prefix || !prefix) {
>
> Argh
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:44:35AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have evidence that DOD runs can miss noticing local variable pointers to
> > live objects on x86 Linux. This is happening while running ponie, but
> > the problem is during a single
