Parrot, but not necessarily a
platform for implementing major new language features (but who knows,
someone still could add some new features to the Ponie C source).
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:46:21 -0400, "Millsa Erlas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Being a Perl 5 user myself, I belie
Being a Perl 5 user myself, I believe that it would be the best idea to
write the final Perl 6 compiler targetting Parrot ideally in Perl 6 or
at least some other higher-high level language such as Haskell. The
reason behind this is this would allow the compiler to be maintained by
Perl 6 develo
Millsa Erlas wrote:
I have thought of an interesting idea that may allow Perl 6 to make the
$, @, and % optional on many uses of variables. This involves simply
extending the function namespace to include all kinds of structures, and
thus the function namespace does not require symbols, they
Austin Hastings wrote:
--- James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Millsa Erlas wrote:
I have thought of an interesting idea that may allow Perl 6 to make
the
$, @, and % optional on many uses of variables. This involves
simply
extending the function namespace to include all
James Mastros wrote:
Millsa Erlas wrote:
I have thought of an interesting idea that may allow Perl 6 to make the
$, @, and % optional on many uses of variables. This involves simply
extending the function namespace to include all kinds of structures, and
thus the function namespace does not
I have thought of an interesting idea that may allow Perl 6 to make the
$, @, and % optional on many uses of variables. This involves simply
extending the function namespace to include all kinds of structures, and
thus the function namespace does not require symbols, they are optional.
The int
I heard that Parrot has a JIT compiler. If I understand this correctly,
does this mean Parrot bytecode is converted to native machine hardware
code before execution? If so, it is a good idea.
JIT is great, however, will it still be possible to run the Parrot
bytecode on the interpretor?
Also,
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On 9 Mar 2005, at 23:34, Millsa Erlas wrote:
Also, what is the status of Ponie and providing complete
interoperability between Perl 5 language and documented XS support and
Parrot and Perl 6? I believe that assuring
For various internal and external reasons work has been
Autrijus Tang wrote:
After a IRC meeting with Leo, I've outlined my roadmap of how to make the three
compiler backends in Pugs to work in concert to provide a much faster evaluator:
http://use.perl.org/~autrijus/journal/23890
Note that existing code in the Eval monad need not be rewritten; also
Markus Laire wrote:
I've been following the development of pugs (http://pugscode.org/), so I
can give a short answer based on that.
While pugs is currently written in Haskell, roadmap does mention the
idea to eventually port pugs to perl6 if needed, which would give us a
Perl 6 compiler writte
What is the current status of the development of the Parrot and the Perl
6 compiler written in Perl? I hope that producing a Perl 6 compiler
written in Perl 6 and the Parrot VM is still a high priority and is
being actively developed as the premier compiler and VM for the Perl 6
language. A Per
11 matches
Mail list logo
