nice... understated, professional
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Wardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:13 PM
Subject: [OT] Parrot Logo
> I came across a nice picture of a parrot in New Scientist while riding
> the train home one ni
;Michael G Schwern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike Lacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: Perl, the new generation
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:15:50PM +0100, Mike Lacey wrote:
> > I read *all* of Camel 1, it was a slim volume and
I read *all* of Camel 1, it was a slim volume and gave (correctly) the
impression that Perl is an easy to get into language that is useful for
loads of things.
You can justifiably still say those things about Perl -- but it's not the
impression you get; and the impression is a lot of what counts.
LOL!
No bias there then Nat :-)
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: Perl, the new generation
> Stephen P. Potter writes:
> > It seems to me that recently (the last two years
Yep, nice thought. I might actually pull my finger out and make a
contribution. Even if it's just documentation and configuration stuff.
- Original Message -
From: "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May
- Original Message -
From: "David Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: Perl, the new generation
.
.
.
> Corporate users do not think in terms of neat and novel, they think in
terms
> of how
People call it "Soak Testing" when they test electronics don't they?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
nah
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen P. Potter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, Febr
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Edward Peschko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and
CPAN)
> > > ..we're waiting
> > > for Larr
Documentation of Perl6 Internals, written by Apprentices and approved by
their Mentors -- that would be *excellent* :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Wiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Tech documentation (Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program)
.
. other (good) stuff ommitted
.
> needing s
interested -- very
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Storrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 9:40 PM
Subject: Perl apprenticing
> I've tried to snip as much as possible without fouling up
> attributions. If I failed, my apologies.
>
> On Thu
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nathan Torkington"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:59 PM
Subject: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentation
> Here are s
ng of the Perl
internals" Yes, I'm sure there are -- but normal users or Perl don't know
any of them. This does not mean that their ideas, badly expressed or not,
are rubbish.
I could go on but I won't. My problem with the critique is this: Seeing a
prominent person in the Perl community bad mouthing his user's best efforts
has taken some of the shine off Perl6 for me; it was unkind.
Mike Lacey, United Kingdom
Err.. A new version of a popular programming language?
- Original Message -
From: "Rocco Caputo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 8:20 PM
Subject: RE: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:46:44 -0
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Ing-Simmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: RFC 211 (v1) The Artistic License Must Be Changed
> Perl6 Rfc Librarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >=head3 Bruce
one of the purposes of perl6-meta is to keep us crazies out of the way of
the developers hope so anyway
mike
15 matches
Mail list logo
