In my opinion, to decide whether it's a bug, you shouldn't look at the
implementation of [X] and [X*], but rather at its practical use.
In what cases would you use it, and what do you expect it to return when
your list of lists happens to be one list?
That's what I was trying to do with my exampl
In my opinion, to decide whether it's a bug, you shouldn't look at the
implementation of [X] and [X*], but rather at its practical use.
In what cases would you use it, and what do you expect it to return when
your list of lists happens to be one list?
That's what I was trying to do with my exampl
That may indeed explain why it works the way it does, but that doesn't
mean it isn't a bug. IMO it certainly is; [X] and [X*] don't work as
advertised.
Let me explain how I found this bug.
I'm generating a list of divisors for a number. I already have the
prime factorization of that number, a
That may indeed explain why it works the way it does, but that doesn't
mean it isn't a bug. IMO it certainly is; [X] and [X*] don't work as
advertised.
Let me explain how I found this bug.
I'm generating a list of divisors for a number. I already have the
prime factorization of that number,
sn't really a bug report, but a feature request.
> The new feature may very well use the same syntax you have provided.
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Michael Schaap
> wrote:
>> # New Ticket Created by Michael Schaap
>> # Please include the string: [pe
ed.
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Michael Schaap
wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Michael Schaap
# Please include the string: [perl #131599]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131599 >
#!/usr/bin/env perl6
my %sum{
Actually, it's not as rare as I thought: the same thing happens when you do:
> my $f = 1/6 + 1/6
On 1-Jan-17 7:16, Zoffix Znet via RT wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 18:59:43 -0800, pe...@mscha.org wrote:
The permutations and combinations routines both give all possibilities,
even if they're not distinct.
> .permutations
((a b b) (a b b) (b a b) (b b a) (b a b) (b b a))
> .combinations(2)
(
(Apologies if this appears twice.)
I was told on IRC to report this as an NYI.
https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-12-03#i_13674766
Thanks,
- Michael
On 6-Dec-16 17:36, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 11:31:59 -0800, pe...@mscha.org wrote:
Coercion type works quite nicely in signatures, e.g.
sub foo(Int(Cool) $f) {
say $f.WHAT;
}
foo "42";# (Int)
but it doesn't work yet in variable declarations,
10 matches
Mail list logo
