Simon Glover wrote:
Why not just use a macro?
# .macro fortytwo (A)
#set .A, 42
# .endm
#
# .fortytwo(I0)
# print I0
# print "\n"
# end
Simon
Shouldn't be The Answer a builtin?
Kay
Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 12:14 -0400 8/10/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
> "VL" == Vladimir Lipskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've committed a würgaround.
i get the english side of the pun. what does the german(?) side mean?
The german verb "würgen" means "to strangle", if I'm not mist
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 04:29 AM, Adam Turoff wrote:
I've never come across a programmer who wishes he could do this
in C and have the compiler magically know what's what:
int spam (int spam, char **spam) {
int eggs;
double spam;
re
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 07:15 PM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
While I'm all for the macros (yeah, I know, debugger stepping issues
and all)
I don't get that. What debugger issues? I changed some vtable calls in
the iterator code and didn't see any differences during debu
