t;ok/not ok" line, or the
following one). Right now I think Apache::Test puts its comments
before the actual test output, which seems reasonable to me, but I'm
not sure it's the norm.
Is it possible to standardize this, so a generic harness knows
which test a comment line acctually describes?
--
Joe Schaefer
ngle
(arbitrary) data stream. It shouldn't even specify STDOUT;
leaving that as an implementation detail makes the protocol more
useful (ie., we should be able to communicate TAP via HTTP, SMTP,
etc.).
--
Joe Schaefer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
> At 5:48 PM -0500 3/23/04, Joe Schaefer wrote:
[...]
> >IMO, the advantage would be that parrot apps will have a better idea
> >of what security model is appropriate.
>
> Well... maybe.
>
> Parrot apps don't get a who
ght from a member of the
peanut gallery.
--
Joe Schaefer
