Patches to hide old test reports if update exists

2006-03-16 Thread Jerry D. Hedden
name}{$osvers}{$archname}{$tester}). Otherwise, $unique{$version}{$perl}{$osname}{$osvers}{$archname}{$tester} is set to the report ID (arbitrary). - The report order is reversed (i.e., lowest ID to highest) by changing "push @reports, $report" to "unshift @reports, $report"

[FWD: Re: FAIL threads-1.09 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread 4.0]

2006-03-15 Thread Jerry D. Hedden
> Subject: Re: FAIL threads-1.09 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread 4.0 > From: Max Maischein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, March 15, 2006 4:43 pm > To: "Jerry D. Hedden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > > Would you mind running this again?

RE: "Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-14 Thread Jerry D. Hedden
Adam Kennedy wrote: > Part of the problem comes in defining "bogus". This is a red herring. Consider the original proposal: If a tester sends in a 'updated' report (matching all the appropriate criteria), then the update should overwrite/mask the original. There is no need to define the criteri

"Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread Jerry D. Hedden
Today, I filed a bug report against CPANPLUS because it sometimes fails to detect missing prerequisites, resulting in bogus FAIL reports being generated against modules: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18144 Here are two examples of such failures: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl