On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 22:20, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:12:12AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> : I'd like to propose the following optimisation:
> : if an attempt is made to load anything over the network
> : (without cryptographic signatures),
> : just system("rm -rf /;halt
Could you please give a little more insight on Haskell and why it
is/would be so good? I've never heard of it.
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 14:23, Matt Fowles wrote:
> All~
>
> If I recall correctly, GCC supports Haskell, which is an ideal language
> for Parrot.
>
> Matt
>
> Simon Glover wrote:
>
>
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 04:49, James Mastros wrote:
> Gerald E Butler wrote:
> > I've been investigating the possibility of creating a MACHINE
> > DESCRIPTION (aka BACK-END) for GCC to target PARROT. My thinking is
> > this: If a satisfactory GCC back-end target
Hello all,
I've been investigating the possibility of creating a MACHINE
DESCRIPTION (aka BACK-END) for GCC to target PARROT. My thinking is
this: If a satisfactory GCC back-end targeting PARROT is created -and-
PARROT is efficient enough (which from reading the documentation thus
far produced
