Re: Synchronized / Thread syntax in Perl 6

o will also have "is atomic". (There's a Google Summer of Code project to add software transactional memory primitives to parrot.) -- Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: new sigil

ve non-type variables in the [] (dependent-typing, or where you can use primitive types like int in template parameters in C++), since being parameters in [] means only that they're types, and not that they are always bound at compile time. (apologies for breaking the unicode) -- Benjamin Smi

Re: $1 change issues [was Re: syntax for accessing multiple versions of a module]

e. Real-world, > > profitable computing is a big, ugly, nasty beast. Basically that would mean that any team would never be able to change language, right? So there would be no difference if we wanted them to change to Perl 5, Perl 6 or Haskell, so it doesn't seem very useful to argue about this. -- Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Changed ??:: to ??!! in Pugs.

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:17:47PM +0100, Benjamin Smith wrote: > In revisions , and -XXX, I proceeded to excise nor and !! and > carry out the ??:: to ??!! change. That's revisions 6848 and 6850-2. -- Benjamin "integral" Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Changed ??:: to ??!! in Pugs.

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:04:15PM +, Luke Palmer wrote: > On 9/8/05, Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pugs currently implements &infix: as an ugly version of the > > &infix: operator. > > > > Are these in the spec? > > No they are

!!/nor and ??!! vs. ??::

Pugs currently implements &infix: as an ugly version of the &infix: operator. Are these in the spec? If so, how does !! interact with the second part of the new ??!! replacement for ??:: ? -- Benjamin "integral" Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Perl development server

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:12:58AM +0100, Benjamin Smith wrote: > * svk > * vim > * screen > * cron * haddock -- Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpB9Er7xurFe.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Perl development server

ouldn't do that have two > > people smoke-testing on the exact same machine or to have two SVN > > mirrors ... > > Good idea, will you take the task of managing these decisions? I'd like to volunteer to setup the SVN/SVK mirror. Software wise can I ask for: *

BEGIN and lexical variables inside subroutines

arly enough for them to modify.) Is there some kind of "prototype pad" (and lexicals) available inside the BEGIN block, rather than a full runtime pad? -- Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpE521lcB3Mw.pgp Description: PGP signature

[PUGS] [PATCH] Tests for closure bug, and die bugs

y $foo; eval '$foo = die "bool"'; $foo;" does die, but at the $foo. -- Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: t/06sub.t === --- t/06sub.t (revision 194) +++ t/06sub.t (workin